Wolfgang Gust

“The final result must be the extermination of the Armenian race.”

(Schuekri Bey)

The Armenian Genocide 1915/16 from the Files of the German Foreign Office

Edition I

Revised and Extended Edition of the Collection of Diplomatic Documents published by Johannes Lepsius in 1919 under the Title: ”Germany and Armenia“

Assistant: Sigrid Gust

Translated by: Vera Draack





Guide for the Topics in the Documentation

The following guide is meant to assist those readers who wish to obtain an overview, as well as those who are only interested in certain aspects of the documentation. It is limited exclusively to the texts of the documents reproduced in this edition.

The fact of the genocide plays an important role in the current discussion on the recognition of the Armenian genocide, because Turkey denies the genocide, respectively makes out acts of revenge by the Armenians, especially in 1917, to be a Turkish genocide by the Armenians (this will be the topic of the coming edition). That is why this guide concentrates on proving the genocide of 1915, which was largely completed by 1916, as well as the background on this genocide, insofar as it comes to light from the files.

For Johannes Lepsius, the genocide of 1915 and 1916 was also in the foreground; thus, this guide in its perceptions does not go far beyond that which the editor Lepsius summed up in his introduction. Only the chapter on Germany’ s role contains new emphases. For those readers with no knowledge of German, however, this guide is an important supplement to the references which come, for the most part, from American sources, because Lepsius’ book, “ Germany and Armenia” has not been translated into English or at least never published in English..

The numerous documents which Lepsius published on the Caucasian campaign are not taken into account in this guide (they are dealt with in the introduction to a later Caucasian edition), nor those on the German relief organisations and their problems, which play a relatively large role in the Lepsius edition.

The testimonials of German diplomats and the German witnesses enlisted by them are in the foreground of the passages quoted. Eye witness reports and the testimonials of Armenians are only added if they have been specifically or tacitly confirmed by German diplomats. This is by no means evidence of a lack of confidence in what is certainly the most important and vivid testimony given by Armenians. This weighting is only meant as preventive action against those who describe the statements made by Armenians as being less credible because they are very prejudiced.

Only a short chapter has been devoted to the German attitude on the Armenian genocide, because the basis in the Lepsius documents is too narrow. It will be treated in full in the next edition.

If the name of the document is printed in bold, an English translation of the original document is available. The original document opens up when the name of the document is clicked on.

Contents

Chapter 1: From the Outbreak of War until the Revolt in Van

(I) Co-existence between the Turks and the Armenians

1) The Armenians’ relationship to the Young Turks after this group came into power

2) Turkish repressions against the Armenians since the spring of 1915

3) Disarming and desertion of the Armenian soldiers

(II) Supposed and Actual Armenian Revolts

1) The events in Zeitun

2) The events in Dörtyol

3) The revolt in Van

Chapter 2: Deportations and Acts of Annihilation

(I) Der 24. April 1915

(II) The Geographical Expansion of the Deportations

(III) Forced Conversions to Islam

(IV) The Deportations as far as the Collection Points

1) The Deportation Trains

2) Isolation of Those Men able to defend Themselves in Labour Battalions

3) Separation and Annihilation of the Armenian Men

4) The Fate of the Women and Girls

5) The Annihilation of Entire Trains

Digression: The Fate of the Catholics and Protestants

(V) From the Collection Points to the Death Camps

1) The Collection Points

2) The Death Trains along the Euphrates River

a) Settlement Attempts

b) The Death Marches in the South and South-East

c) Acts of Annihilation

Chapter 3: Pretexts for the Genocide and Defences

(I) The Pretexts

1) Sympathy for the Entente

2) Accusation of Treason against the Armenians

(II) The Defences

Chapter 4: The Policy of the Final Solution

(I) The Collision Course

1) The Policy of the Young Turks

2) The Role of the Turkish Military

(II) The Motives for the Annihilation of the Armenians

1) Gains

2) The Will of the Turkish Hardliners to Destroy

(III) The Dimension of the Genocide

(IV) The Statistics on the Genocide

(V) Covering Up and Denying the Genocide

Chapter 5: Those Responsible for the Genocide

(I) The Initiators

1) The Leadership in Constantinople

2) The Role of the Young Turks

3) Those Responsible in the Provinces

a) The Agitators

b) The Moderates

(II) The Executives

1) Government Agencies

2) The Military

3) The Gendarmes

4) Special Organisations and Ethnos

(III) Turkish resistance to the Deportations

Chapter 6: The role of the Germans

(I) Germany and the Armenians of the Ottoman Empire

1) Antipathy of the Armenian Population towards Germany

2) Search for Refugee by the Armenian Clergy

3) Political Pressure on the Armenians

(II) Germany’s Position with Regard to the Deportations

1) Approval to the Deportations

2) The Principe of Non-Intervention in Turkish Politics

3) Disapproval of the Genocide by Germans in Turkey

(III) Germany and the Consequences of the Genocide

1) Germany’s Economic Interests in Turkey

2) The Public in Germany

3) The People of the World

(IV) Germany’s Joint Responsibility for the Genocide

1) Statements on German Involvement in the Genocide

2) Protests against German Involvement in the Genocide

3) German Settlement Plans for Armenians along the Baghdad Railway Line?

4) The Baghdad Railway and its Armenian Employees

(V) German Attempts at Justification

(VI) The German Military


Chapter 1: From the Outbreak of War until the Revolt in Van

In Turkish history, 20 April 1915 is considered to be the reason for the strong action taken against the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, and this portrayal was accepted, although only officially, by the Germans. According to the Turkish portrayal, the Armenians in the eastern Armenian metropolis of Van revolted on this day against the Turkish government and, thus, attacked the fighting troops from the rear. The logical consequence was the evacuation of the Armenians from those regions close to the front.

Although official German policy at that time agreed to this version, to which the Turkish people have adhered until the present, reports of German observers did not. This version was accepted by only a few diplomats and for only a few weeks, as it was not possible to observe the situation in Van personally, for the German Empire did not have consular representation in Van, nor did it have much contact with the German and Swiss representatives of relief organisations there. Soon, the impression of the German diplomatic representatives in the Ottoman Empire was that the Turkish government was merely using the real or supposed revolt of the Armenians in Van as an excuse to deport and exterminate the Armenians.

For already before 20 April 1915, rigorous measures were taken by the Turks against the Armenians and these were described by the German observers. Until the obvious outbreak of the Armenian genocide the Germans’ relationship to the new Turkey of the Young Turks as well as speculations on Russian intentions and the Armenians’ reactions to this was at the foreground of German interest.

The Armenians, the most important minority in the Ottoman Empire, apart from the Greeks, had suffered greatly under Turkish rulership in the past, especially in the period from 1894 until 1896, when hundreds of thousands of Armenians were killed in massacres. However, since the Young Turks had taken over power the climate between the two ethnic groups had improved noticeably. Several German sources go into this new situation.

(I) Co-existence between the Turks and the Armenians

1) The Armenians’ relationship to the Young Turks after this group came into power

In a report on the beginning of 1915, the German journalist, von Tyszka, writes:


Those Germans in a position of responsibility kept raising this point particularly concerning the harmony in their justification reports. For example, the Secretary of State, Zimmermann, spoke to the Imperial Committee of Ways and Means on 29 September 1916:
The German consuls also received official signals on the return to normality from the Armenians. The Armenian bishop in the city, Monsignore Seadetian, already reported to the German consul in Erzerum, Edgar Anders, in 1914 after the acceptance of European reform proposals by the Ottoman government, after which his fellow countrymen had been given extensive autonomy in the eastern provinces,
This appeasement was particularly evident in the fact that the majority of Ottoman Armenians wished for a certain amount of autonomy, but not the integration with Russian Armenia and, thus, the Russian Empire. The German ambassador in Constantinople, the capital at that time and today called Istanbul, Hans Baron von Wangenheim, reported after a conversation with the Armenian patriarch to his superior office in Berlin:
The Russian Armenians also seemed to have the same aversion to an integration. Already in the autumn of 1913, Consul Anders had reported after an audience with the Catholicon of all Armenians in Etshmiadjin:
2) Turkish repressions against the Armenians since the spring of 1915

After the outbreak of war, the relationship of the two peoples towards each other changed. Vice-Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, who stood in as administrator for Consul Edgar Anders while he was in Russian captivity, reported from Erzerum in connection with the “purges”:


Consul Roessler received confirmation of the Turks’ actions against the Armenians in the far north-eastern part of the country from the highest Turkish provincial official personally. Roessler writes that the Wali of Aleppo, Djelal Bey, had reported to him,
Ambassador Wangenheim reports:
The German Protestant Christians, who were also well informed by their missionaries in Turkey, speak in a petition addressed to the Imperial Chancellor of the Turkish acts of terror against the Armenians:
Turkish opinion towards the Armenians had changed fundamentally. The German journalist, von Tysza, writes:
This did not only apply to those Armenians near the Russian border. Vice-Consul Hermann Hoffmann-Foelkersamb reports from the Mediterranean harbour town of Alexandrette, today known as Iskenderun:
If Armenians were not the victims of the massacres, then of the hard measures carried out against them, for example when they were called up to do transport duty at the front. Wangenheim says that the Armenian side had maintained,
This was also confirmed by Sister Alma Johansson. The German Consul General at the Embassy in Constantinople, Johann Heinrich Hermann Mordtmann, who was responsible for reporting on the Armenians, noted after a conversation with this Swedish lady, who was in the service of the “German Christian Charity Organisation for the Orient”:
3) Disarming and desertion of the Armenian soldiers

After the conquest of Anatolia by the Turks in the Middle Ages until the Young Turk Revolution in 1908, Armenians, like all Christians, were not allowed to use weapons in military service. After only a few years of equal rights, the Turkish government again limited admittance to military service. Scheubner-Richter reports from Erzerum:


As an explanation for this, the Turks reported that Armenian soldiers had shot at their Turkish superiors. From Constantinople, Wangenheim reports on the Armenian soldiers:
Undersecretary of State Zimmermann also supported this version at the meeting of the Imperial Committee of Ways and Means on 29 September 1916:

Shortly after Turkey had entered the war on our side, in October 1914, we already received the news from the Consul in Aleppo that the military conscription of the Armenians would be subject to great difficulties ... The complaints lodged about desertions and switching of numerous Armenians to the Russian side were ever increasing.


After a discussion with Posseldt, the German general who was residing in Erzerum, Mordtmann noted with regard to these accusations:
At that time there were deserters in the Ottoman Empire, both among the Armenians as well as other nationalities, but also among the Turks. With the exception of Zeitun, the German observers did not confirm a large-scale desertion among the Armenian soldiers. Vice-Consul Hoffmann remarks:
(II) Supposed and Actual Armenian Revolts

In spring, events took place in several towns in the Ottoman Empire which were regarded by one side as being Armenian revolts and by other sides as inconsequentialities or purely defence on the part of the Armenians. German sources, in particular, give a great deal of information on the events in Zeitun (known today as Süleymanli, north of Marash) and in the coastal town of Dörtyol. German diplomatic representatives were not present in Van, but because of the importance of the occurrences there, German sources often speak of them.

1) The events in Zeitun

Zeitun is a town north of Marash, known today as Kahramanmaras, which has always been populated by Armenians. It made history, because for a long time it held a semi-autonomous status. Its inhabitants, exclusively Armenians, had always proven themselves to be particularly ready to show active resistance and withstood Turkish sieges several times. This won them the admiration of all the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire and the hatred of the Turks.

Ambassador Wangenheim reports in the middle of April 1915:


Specifically, Wangenheim is referring to the events in Zeitun, the Armenian stronghold. Armenian deserters from Zeitun and surrounding areas, but also from Marash barricaded themselves in a monastery there. In the beginning, the reports sent from Aleppo by the German Consul, Walter Roessler, were still confusing. Although he was responsible for Zeitun, he had not personally researched the situation there. Roessler:
According to Ambassador Wangenheim, the Minister of the Interior, Talaat, passed on information regarding Zeitun which revealed that
Wangenheim further: Roessler reported:
Roessler’s colleague from Adana, Eugen Buege, excludes that the Armenians from the mountain town had even joined the deserters and rebelled against the Turkish administration, as was later on repeatedly maintained. Wangenheim reports to Berlin that concerning the background Eugen Buege reported that
In a further report, Roessler defined more closely that the matter concerned an isolated monastery
According to a very detailed report from Roessler, the disturbances in Zeitun
Something completely different could be read in a later attempt at justification made by the Undersecretary of State in the German Foreign Office, Arthur Zimmermann. At the end of September 1916, Zimmermann (who meanwhile had been promoted to Secretary of State) writes in a note meant for a discussion with the Grand Duchess of Baden, who had inquired of the German Emperor about the fate of the Armenians:
Neither the reports made by the German consuls nor those from other German sources agree with this account. In October 1914, the inhabitants of Zeitun had even handed deserters over to the government, for which they had been guaranteed immunity. But according to a very detailed report by Roessler, the president of the Turkish government had
Roessler also reported on the fate of the deserters:
The Catholicon of Sis, Sahak, sent a further detailed report on the events in Zeitun through German channels to the patriarch in Constantinople:
This annihilation had indeed been planned. In a report on the events in Zeitun, Roessler writes:
The Armenians of Zeitun were the first to be deported. Roessler estimates figures of
The German missionary, Blank, reports in a letter to Roessler:
And missionary Blank writes in a letter to his superior, Schuchardt:
In a later report on the events in Zeitun, the German journalist, von Tyszka, writes:
Marash , where a significant Armenian colony lived, was directly affected by the events in Zeitun. The shooting of Turkish gendarmes in Zeitun had had a great effect on the Turkish population in Marash. Roessler reports:
In his detailed report on Zeitun, Roessler also reports on the effects on Marash of the events there:
Roessler reports that, as in Zeitun, the Armenians from Marash and the surroundings villages were already deported before the supposed revolt in Van:
It is conclusively evident from Roessler’s reports that the point for those Turks who were responsible was not to persecute the Armenian ringleaders. For example, the authorities also took action against a charitable society which had never bothered with political matters at all. Roessler:
The German consul also reported on acts of brutality carried out by soldiers:
2) The events in Dörtjol:

Armenian deserters had also hidden in Dörtjol, a town on the Mediterranean coast heavily populated by Armenians. The consul in Adana, Eugen Buege, gives a detailed account based on the report of the Armenian auxiliary official, Simon Agabalian, concerning which Buege believes “that altogether the matter has been described accurately”. Agabalian:


Wangenheim also mentions the events in Dörtjol in a report:
Simon Agabalian also mentions the affair carried out in the dead of night:
Supposed counter-intelligence activities had also been reported from the Mediterranean town of Alexandrette (today known as Iskenderum), not far from Dörtjol. In a later report by Vice-Consul Hoffman, stationed in Alexandrette, he describes just how much these events were exaggerated, poking fun particularly at the report of the German expert on the Far East, Baron Max von Oppenheim, who determined that there were “traces of a militarily organised conspiracy” in Dörtjol among other places. According to Hoffman, such traces were
3) The revolt in Van:

German diplomats were only able to report from hearsay on Van, the quasi-official trigger for the Armenian genocide, because there was no German consulate in Van. The news from German and Swiss members of relief organisations who were stationed there is only to be found in a very fragmentary manner in the files of the German Foreign Office. Thus, Turkish accounts predominate in the German diplomatic correspondence.

Due to a report from Erzerum also based on official Turkish statements, Wangenheim reports to Berlin:


In order to give at least some background information, Wangenheim quotes from a party report made to the international Congress of Socialists on the activities of the rulers in Van, Daschnakzutiun.
Based on further Turkish reports, Scheubner-Richter reports from Erzerum:
It is only in the middle of May that, obviously based on internal information, the German consul can report on the reasons behind the revolt in Van:
It is not obvious from the contemporary reports by German observers collected at the German Foreign Office how high the toll was, taken by the so-called revolt of Van. The figures of Turkish and Armenian victims in Van available today lie in the region of several hundred, several thousand if the number of those who fled is added. Just how grotesquely awful the situation on information available to the Germans was at that time is proven by the report by the naval attaché, Hans Humann, who claims – even though he was a very close friend of Enver Pasha – after a conversation with his confidant (which was passed on without comment by von Wangenheim):
The German journalist, Tyszka, reports for the first time on the events in Van from an Armenian point of view:
Because he himself could not picture the situation, Tyszka also gives the Turkish version:
The account of the embassy councillor at the Turkish Embassy in Berlin, Edhem Bey, represents the height of Turkish fiction. In a discussion with the officer in charge in the Ministery of External Affairs, Rosenberg, he maintained that the “drastic change” in the treatment of the Armenians first came about in April,
These supposedly 180000 dead Muslims in Van were never accepted by the Germans. In his notes for a discussion with the Grand Duchess of Baden at the end of September 1916, Secretary of State Zimmer did at least give figures:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Alexandrette regarded the events in Van in a much more down-to-earth manner, because he had had enough experience with Turkish statements and understood their mentality. He simply subtracted the 150000 Kurds in the Van area from the Turkish reports, because he knew:
To sum up: According to German reports, the revolt in Dörtjol was not a revolt and the revolt in Zeitun happened differently from the way it was reported by the Turkish. The Germans had no authentic reports on Van, but their ultimate reserve in judgement of the supposed or actual revolt signalises great reservations towards the official Turkish version.


Chapter 2: Deportations and Acts of Annihilation

Deportations in great numbers and obviously according to a central plan began in May 1915. In the beginning, apart from the intellectuals in the capital city of Constantinople and the supposedly insurgent people in Zeitun and towns along the Mediterranean coast, they mainly befell the Armenians in the east near the Russian front. From the very beginning, acts of annihilation were carried out alongside the deportations, such as in the plains of Mush, the Erzerum plateau, in the town of Trebizond and in the area surrounding Erzindjan. Furthermore, a Vali (Reschid Bey) in Vilayet Diarbekir, called “ ;bloodhound” by the German diplomats, carried out acts of extermination against the Armenians in a war of annihilation against Christians of all denominations. Insofar as the deported reached their area of destination at all, these were to be found south of Aleppo, but especially along the river Euphrates in the Syrian desert. Apart from the deportation and annihilation of the Armenians, conversions to Islam were carried out by force or under great pressure. Despite German protests, not only the Gregorian, but also the Catholic and the Protestant Armenians were deported and annihilated.

(I) 24 April 1915

All over the world, Armenians remember the genocide of 1915/16 on 24 April. On that day in the year 1915, the Ottoman government had all Armenian intellectuals of any importance arrested and sent to the interior. Only a few of those arrested survived. In German sources, this annihilation of the Armenian elite is mentioned in only a few documents.

On 30 April 1915, Ambassador Hans Baron von Wangenheim reported on the arrest of the Armenian elite:


Talaat justified the arrests as follows to the first dragoman from the German embassy:
The German Protestant Christians described the events in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor as follows:

The measures were thereby so implemented that in the main city and in the centres inland, the leaders of the population, intellectuals, notabilities and church dignitaries were thrown into prison overnight and without interrogation and court proceedings either shot or deported. [1915-11-10-DE-011]

The German journalist, von Tyszka, reports from Constantinople on the fate of the Armenian elite:


A few days later, Ambassador Wangenheim reports on the Armenians banned and the Armenian doctor, Tschilinguirian, about whom he had had enquiries made because of his German wife:
(II) The Geographical Expansion of the Deportations

Both the period when the deportation of the Armenians in great numbers began as well as the forms it took varied from region to region. The first to be deported after the Armenians from Zeitun were the Armenians from the provinces close to the Russian border and those on the coast of the eastern Mediterranean which was controlled by the Entente fleet. In detail, Erzerum and its surroundings, the plains of Mush (on which over one hundred purely Armenians villages were to be found) as well as the area around Bitlis were affected; furthermore, the coastal strip on the Black Sea, especially Trebizond. But very soon the deportations were expanded to those regions which were not situated near the front, until finally the Armenians from all regions were deported or threatened with deportation. Local conditions were a further factor for the regional expansion of the deportations, on the one hand due to the presence of Turkish agitators, and on the other hand Ottoman officials who opposed the deportations or at least wished that they be carried out more humanely.

Erzerum was the largest town close to the Russian border, where the organisers of the genocide as well as Turkish military and police chiefs in favour of deportation were staying. German reports well verify the deportations in the north-east, because Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, the Vice-Consul and administrator in Erzerum (Anders, the German consul, had been taken a prisoner of war by the Russians), was an attentive observer.

Scheubner-Richter reporting on the countryside around Erzerum:


Directly from the town the Vice-Consul reports:
On the very same day he reports to his embassy:
A day later, Scheubner-Richter send a telegram saying it was
Two days later he cables once again:
The German Lieutenant Colonel, Stange, also situated in Erzerum, gives an account of the evacuation of the area around Erzerum in a later report:
Concerning the deportations in Erzerum, Stange writes:
Deportations also began in other regions. The deportations in Cilicia were observed by three German consuls. In the middle of May, Consul Eugen Buege writes from Adana:
Consul Roessler:
At this time, the deportations from Zeitun and the surrounding villages had already been completed. Consul Walter Roessler from Aleppo, whose area of responsibility includes Zeitun, reports in the middle of June:
Ambassador Wangenheim:
Apart from diplomats, those Germans also give reports whose statements have been taken down by the diplomats, even though they are not members of the diplomatic corps. Consul General Johann Heinrich Hermann Mordtmann, responsible for the Armenian matters at the embassy in Constantinople, had a conversation with the Swedish sister of the German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient in Mush, Alma Johansson, who had travelled to Kharput after being expelled from Mush. The German Reich had no consular representation in either Mush or Kharput.
The preacher from the German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient and head of the orphanage, Johannes Ehmann, reports regularly from Charput and as a rule his observations were passed on by the German embassy to Berlin. At the end of June Ehmann reports:
The German consuls in other parts of the country also reported on deportations. Vice-Consul Walter Holstein sent a telegram from Mossul:
The German Reich was represented on the coast of the Black Sea by Consul Heinrich Bergfeld (in Trebizond) and Consul M. Kuckhoff (in Samsun). Consul Bergfeld reports from Trebizond:
Two days later he reports:
Again two days later:
Bergfeld summarises in a longer letter:
Ambassador Wangenheim adds to the report:

Only the sick were excepted; later an exception was granted for widows, orphans, old people and children under the age of five years, also for the sick and for Catholic Armenians. According to the latest reports, however, most of the exceptions were revoked once again and only children and those who were not transportable, remained behind, the latter were brought into hospitals. [1915-07-07-DE-001]

In violation of the strict rules of observation for professional diplomats, the elected Vice-Consul, Kuckhoff, also reported from Samsun in June:


A short while later, Kuckhoff attempted to qualify his statements:
Finally, Kuckhoff returned to his duty merely to observe and reported:
In July, Wangenheim reports for the first time on the increasing extent of the deportations:
The German Protestant Christians report in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor that
At this point, the deportations from the areas close to the front had already been completed. Scheubner-Richter reported from Erzerum:
A short while later, the German Red Cross doctor, Neukirch, also reported from Erzindjan:
A report by Scheubner-Richter lets one guess what had happened in the meantime in eastern Turkey. In November 1915, he rode from his official residence in Erzerum through the east to Mossul:
Those Turks who were responsible deported the Armenian population even from the furthest western region. Hohenlohe-Langenburg, Wangenheim’s deputy, reports:
Even Consul Roessler now suspected:
The German journalist, Rudolf Zabel, from the Tägliche Rundschau gives a very detailed description of the trains running from western Anatolia into the valley of the Euphrates. Mordtmann recorded his accounts:
At the end of October, Vice-Consul Hoffman writes from Aleppo:
The German journalist, von Tyszka, confirmed these deportations of the Armenians from almost all of the regions:
In the meantime, the Armenians had even been driven out of the European part of Turkey, as is evident from a later report by Ambassador Wolff-Metternich:
Consul Buege reports from Kilikien that the deportations have not only been expanded, but are also being carried out more vigorously:
Roessler:
For various reasons, not all of the Armenians were affected by the first waves of deportation. At the beginning of 1916, a second wave of deportation took place.

Roessler reported the following on the city of Aintab:


In Marash as well, a larger colony of Armenians had also survived the first deportations. Roessler now reports:
The Swiss nun in German service, Beatrice Rohner, reports that her colleague, Paula Schaefer, is responsible for
A few weeks later Roessler writes:
Wolff-Metternich adds:
Paula Schaefer, the German sister stationed in Marash, reports:
In October 1916, Roessler reports on Marash one last time:
New phases of deportation were also carried out in towns further into the interior of Anatolia. Pastor Ernst Jacob Christoffel reported:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich adds:
Wolff-Metternich summarises:
Roessler adds:
Aleppo was the most important town in southern East Anatolia, with an important minority of Armenians, and for a long time it was the most important through town for the caravans of the deported.

Consul Roessler:


Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports from Aleppo:
Roessler some weeks later:
At the beginning of 1916, Consul Roessler reports from his seat of office that the Armenians in his town will also be deported, even though the Armenians not born in Aleppo will be sent first:
Shortly afterwards, Roessler states more precisely:
In April 1916 Roessler writes:
Beatrice Rohner reports that in Aleppo there were
According to Roessler, the Vali of Aleppo gave the following explanation for weapons supposedly found in Aleppo:
Roessler adds that it remains to be seen just how far the term ”resided in Aleppo“ will be qualified. Roessler then goes on:
Consul Loytved-Hardegg from Damaskus gives an explanation for the situation in Aleppo:
Beatrice Rohner:
Roessler a good week later:
Roessler later gives an estimate on the number of deportations:
Finally, in August 1916, Roessler reports the beginning of the deportations from Aleppo:
There were no further reports on deportations from Aleppo. There are only assumptions as to the reasons for this. Roessler had reported previously:
Roessler had reported a year previously from Kilikien on attempts by the Armenians to buy their exemption from the deportations:
From this time on, the German reports from Aleppo were mainly concerned with the care of the uprooted Armenians, mainly the orphans. In March 1917, Roessler makes another reference to the extent of the relief work and, referring to those requiring care in Aleppo, speaks of
The capital city of Constantinople is also a special case, as is the most important harbour city of Smyrna. Already after the deportations from the town of Izmit, situated near the capital city, the Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission, Hohenlohe-Langenburg, had drawn attention to the consequences for Constantinople:
Neurath, the Chargé d’Affaires appointed after the death of Wangenheim, added:
But only four days later Neurath warned:
At this point, even the Secretary of State of the German Foreign Office, Jagow, became involved. He cabled to his ambassador that the Turkish government was said to have
The new ambassador, Wolff-Metternich, confirmed the fears of his predecessor and reported to Bethmann Hollweg:
Despite the Germans’ fears, the majority of the Armenians residing in Constantinople were spared from deportation. It is not clear from the files whether this was due to the intervention of the Germans or for other reasons.

It was a different matter in the case of the important harbour town of Smyrna . Here, the intervention of a German general definitely saved the Armenians from being deported.

Chargé d’Affaires Radowitz sent a telegram to Berlin in November 1916:


The German diplomat was to be proven wrong, for the German general finally succeeded. Liman von Sanders on the deportation of the Armenians in Smyrna:
Kuehlmann, the Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, reported this enforcement shortly thereafter:
The retreat of the Russians from the Ottoman Empire after the October Revolution in Russia led to a completely new situation in world politics. Germany strived for a peace treaty with the Bolshevists. For this reasons, deportations of Russian Armenians or those Armenians who had been under Russian protection until that time were to be prevented.

In case of new deportations, Kuehlmann, the Secretary of State of the German Foreign Office, instructed the ambassador in Constantinople,


Ambassador Bernstorff cabled back:
Kuehlmann also asked his ambassador in Constantinople to intervene with the Turkish government in case of renewed deportations of Armenians from Anatolia,
One of Talaat’s statements, repeated by Ambassador Bernstorff, fits rather better under the heading of cynicism:
In the spring of 1918, Roessler reports on the final deportations from the region north of Kharput:
To sum up: With the exception of the inhabitants of Smyrna and, to some extent, Aleppo as well as those who had been residing in Constantinople for a long time, all of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire who lived within the pre-War boundaries were deported or chosen for deportation. From this time on, their survival depended on the course of the deportations.

(III) Forced Conversions to Islam

An unknown number of Armenians remained in their home towns or in towns that were mainly in Anatolia. Armenian women were incorporated in harems, children in families or orphanages, boys and men were hidden. It also seems that village communities received permission to stay under certain conditions. It was a precondition for all of these people that they convert to Islam. A conversion to Islam which was generally carried out by force destroyed the identity of those Armenians who survived outside the cities of Constantinople and – in the beginning – Smyrna, an identity which mainly included the Gregorian, sometimes also the Catholic or Protestant faith.

Vice-Consul Kuckhoff reports from Samsun:


In a petition to the Imperial Chancellor, the German Protestant Christians write:
Undersecretary of State, Arthur Zimmermann, writes to his Ambassador Wolff-Metternich in Constantinople that according to his information
The Director and Deputy Chairman of the German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient, Friedrich Schuchardt, reports to the German Foreign Office on his investigations in Constantinople:
Consul Buege reports from Adana:
Officially, those in a position of responsibility in Constantinople denied any form whatsoever of centrally forced conversions to Islam and placed the blame – as was done so often in the case of the deportations – on the “ ;infringement by lower civil servants”. Ambassador Neurath quotes the Foreign Minister:
This is in direct opposition to the statements made by the German observers. Vice-Consul Hoffmann speaks of
Those in charge also denied the forced conversions to Islam in conversations with Ambassador Wolff-Metternich. The ambassador summarises:
Wolff-Metternich repeats the views of further witnesses:
Concerning his field of work, Consul Roessler reports:
Wolff-Metternich writes with regard to the forced conversions to Islam:
But for the past month the German witnesses on the spot have been speaking of further forced conversions to Islam. Werth, the secretary at the consulate, reports from Sivas on the discovery of a Greek-Armenian committee. According to Werth, as a result of that
Loytved-Hardegg, the Consul in Damascus, reports:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich:
Only two days later the ambassador states more precisely:
Wolff-Metternich believes,
The consulate secretary in Sivas, Werth, reports:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Alexandrette reports from the south:
It is also clear to Zimmermann, Secretary of State of the German Foreign Office, that the Armenians have been forced to convert to Islam. He instructs his manager in Constantinople, Goeppert:
Goeppert’s response:
Ernst I. Christoffel, the manager of Malatia, the home for the blind, summarises his experiences:
(IV) The Deportations as far as the Collection Points:

To give a rough idea, the deportation trains travelled to collection points in the south of the country, especially to Aleppo and the surrounding area. There they separated in two directions: one went south to Palastina, the other east along the river Euphrates to the Mesopotamian desert, towards Mossul. The Turkish administration headquarters for the deportations was also in Aleppo.

As found throughout the entire implementation of the Armenian genocide, there were also extremely varied processes here: they ranged from the annihilation of entire deportation trains to – relatively – well-ordered deportations, although this applied to only a few trains and also usually only to certain stretches. Many reports give a general impression of what happened on the Anatolian roads.

1) The Deportation Trains

Most of those deported were sent via certain routes. One of the deportation routes was from Trebizond and Erzerum via Erzindjan to the south, whereby there was a difference – in some cases a great difference – between the trains from the two towns.

Ambassador Wangeheim on the deportations from Trebizond:


This was confirmed by the wartime volunteer, Carl Schlimme, who reports the following about a horseride in June 1915:
Neukirch, the German Red Cross doctor stationed in Erzindjan:
Scheubner-Richter reported from Erzerum:
The Red Cross doctor, Neukirch, compared the miserable state of the trains from Trebizond with the relatively well-organised deportation trains from Erzerum:
For most of the deported, the journey continued through the infamous Kemach gorge. Their fate is documented elsewhere.

An Austrian personally witnessed the passing of a train of deported people near Urfa:


Consul Roessler gives an estimate of the losses suffered on the Armenian deportation trains:
Germans from Konia made other observations. The head of the local Anatolian Society of Industry and Commerce, Willy Seeger, the secondary school teacher, Georg Biegel, the foreman, Heinrich Janson, and the graduate engineer, J.E. Maurer, informed the embassy in a joint letter:
Consul Roessler, who gathered many reports on the fate of the Armenians, personally experienced the passage of deportees at his seat of office in Aleppo:
Von Tyszka, the German journalist:
The German Protestant Christians report in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor that the measures of deportation
Scheubner-Richter writes about a horseride from Erzerum via Khinis, Mush, Bitlis and Seert to Mossul:
The German teacher, Martin Niepage, speaks in his report to the German parliamentarians of
Consul Roessler reports on stretches in the Syrian desert south of Urfa where those responsible were obviously only interested in exhausting the deportees:
The Catholic member of the Reichstag, Matthias Erzberger, notes in a memo:
Hunger and thirst , in part deliberately brought about by those responsible, decimated the deportees. Because, so Wangenheim,
Schlimme, the German wartime volunteer, reports that he
Consul Roessler:
The Germans Seeger, Biegel & Co write:
Roessler’s summary:
2) Isolation of Those Men able to defend Themselves in Labour Battalions

In order to eliminate resistance to the deportations, those responsible for the genocide had isolated the Armenian soldiers from their fellow countrymen. Already in March 1915, the Armenian soldiers were not permitted to bear arms in military service. Wangenheim reports that


Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter reported that
In a petition to the Imperial Chancellor, the German Protestant Christians speak of
But the German Protestant Christians were also aware of the later fate of the labour battalions:
This fate is confirmed by the Swiss deacon from Urfa, Kuenzler. On 20 August 1915, he reports:
Scheubner-Richter reports that Halil Bey’s campaign to northern Persia
3) Separation and Annihilation of the Armenian Men

Separating men and women was a measure constantly used to weaken the deportees. Vice-Consul Holstein reports from Mossul:


Consul Roessler from Aleppo:
Roessler further reports:
A witness reported to Roessler:
In Erzindjan, Scheubner-Richter observed deportation trains from Trebizond:
An Austrian reports:
The German journalist, von Tyszka, writes:
Scheubner-Richter summarises after his ride through eastern Anatolia:
Finally, Vice-Consul Hoffman from Aleppo reports:
For, generally speaking, these men were the victims of mass murders . German evidence gives information on the fate of these men, most of whom were separated from their families. Mordtmann, the expert on Armenia, notes after a conversation with Sister Alma Johansson on Kharput:
Consul Roessler confirmed the fate of the men from Kharput who were separated from the women in a village a few hours along the road south of the town:
Vice-Consul Holstein reports from Mossul:
From Erzerum, Scheubner-Richter reported on 500 deported Armenians:
According to Scheubner-Richter, part of a second group
In other regions, according to Scheubner-Richter, the deportations were carried out even more rigorously than in Erzerum:
The wartime volunteer, Carl Schlimme, found confirmation of this during a horseride in June 1915:
Lieutenant Colonel Stange also knew of the mass murders of the Armenian men:
The expert on Armenia, Mordtmann, states in his notes as one of
The teacher from Allepin, Martin Niepage, writes in his report to the German representatives of the people that he no longer wished to linger with
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Aleppo summarises:
The men’s escape was a standard excuse used to explain why male deportees were missing on the trains. Hoffmann on this point:
4) The Fate of the Women and Girls

After the extensive annihilation of the Armenian men right at the beginning of the deportations, the women and girls were left defenceless. Consul Roessler appeals to his embassy:


Vice-Consul Holstein also confirms that women and children were left to cope on their own, and writes about the consequences:
Consul Roessler confirms these observations:
On his ride through the east, Scheubner-Richter found traces of Armenian women:
The German Protestant Christians report in their petition to the Imperial Chancellor that
Vice-Consul Hoffmann’s observations in Aleppo:
For many Armenian mothers, the sale of girls and children was the only chance of keeping their children alive. Consul Roessler reports:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann also reports on the sale of girls and women:
One-and-a-half years later, the wife of the German head of the orphanage in Kharput, Mrs. Ehmann, gives information on the fate of many of these women and children:
In some cases, German witnesses report on extreme sexual power of disposal over the defenceless Armenian women.

The German missionary, Blank, reports on the orders of an officer:


Vice-Consul Hoffmann describes in detail orders given for young girls and women and verifies them with photographs:
There can be no doubt as to the fates of these four sisters who, as a result of the above orders, were separated from their families and deported without any male protection. I have searched in vain for an explanation to justify these orders. Anyone who knows about family life and morality in Turkey, will not be able to free himself of the feeling of witnessing an outrage, of being astounded at the recklessness with which the Turkish authorities issue orders of this kind in answer to petitions by a German company. [1916-01-03-DE-001]

The German engineer, Bastendorff, reports on the fate of Armenian women in Ras ul Ain:


As in the case of the men, the deported women were also subjected to mass murders . An Austrian witness reports on the statements of Armenian women who fled:
An eye witness, who travelled on the Baghdad railway, reported to Vice-Consul Hoffmann:
In his report to the representatives of the people, the teacher, Martin Niepage, did not wish to
Armenian women often only survived because they were taken in by Turks and Kurds. Very few had had – relatively – good experiences during deportation. With regard to these women, the Austrian witness reported:
5) Annihilation of Entire Trains

According to the German reports, the Armenians were partly or totally annihilated in several residential locations.

Mordtmann, the German consul general responsible for reporting on the Armenians in Turkey, noted after a discussion with the Swedish nun, Alma Johansson, who worked for the “German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient“ , on the events in Mush during the middle of June 1915:


Vice-Consul Holstein from Mossul reports on Mardin:
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter reports that
Concerning Trebizond, Lieutenant Colonel Stange was able to report:
Consul Bergfeld from Trebizond:
Mass killing right in the residential location was also carried out in Angora, today known as Ankara. Ambassador Hohenlohe writes to Berlin that according to investigations by the Armenian Catholic Patriarch,
Vice-Consul Holstein reports that
Scheubner-Richter travelled from Erzerum to Bitlis and reports on
Many of the deported never reached their goal, because they were killed along the way. The annihilation of entire trains has been documented several times. Vice-Consul Holstein reports from Mossul:
Scheubner-Richter also reports on the mass murders of the deportees:
Shortly thereafter, Scheubner-Richter gives a first estimate of the number of victims:
Later, Scheubner-Richter corrected the figure which had obviously been given to him by the government:
Wangenheim reports to Berlin:
The stretch that was so lethal for the Armenians led through the Kemagh gorge of the river Euphrates, south of Erzindjan. Scheubner-Richter reports:
Lieutenant Colonel Stange, the German officer who was also stationed in Erzerum, states more precisely:
Mass murders also took place along tributaries of the Euphrates. An eye witness reported to Roessler:
The German witnesses reported several times on having seen the bodies of Armenian deportees in the Euphrates. Consul Roessler:
In a further report, Roessler writes:
The elimination of the bodies also bears witness to the deaths along the deportation roads. An Austrian testifies:
Consul Roessler reports from Aleppo:

Two dying women lay near a grave. Around them stand gravediggers and street urchins, waiting for the moment of death to lay them in the grave. In answer to my question, how these women got to the cemetery, I was told: There were five bodies brought on an oxen cart, placed one on top of the other without a coffin. When the gravedigger wanted to carry out his duties he noticed that of the five bodies three were still alive. A boy whose death did not seem to be imminent was taken away from the cemetery, while the two women were kept there. [1915-09-27-DE-014]

Roessler reports on a journey he made:


Another time, Roessler wrote that according to the latest reports there could be no doubt
Digression: The Fate of the Catholics and Protestants:

The German Christians’ special interest in the Armenians lay in their brothers in faith, the Protestants and the Catholics. Even the German diplomats attempted to achieve exceptional measures for them, often under special pressure from denominational groups in Germany. Although the Germans were assured that the Catholic and Protestant Armenians would be excepted from deportations, these promises were not kept. Consul Roessler reports:


Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg reports to Berlin:
Consul Roessler reports from Aleppo:
Goeppert, the Legation Councillor sent for a short period to Constantinople, reports to his superiors in Berlin:
Consul Roessler:
Mordtmann, the Consul General at the Embassy responsible for Armenian matters, quotes from a letter written by Willy Seeger, a German in Konia:
The Catholic Centre politician and member of the Reichstag, Matthias Erzberger, attempted several times to become active on behalf of the Catholic Armenians. Erzberger reported that the Vatican representative in Constantinople, Monsignore Dolci, had assured the German pastor, Straubinger,
Talaat Pasha also assured Ambassador Wolff-Metternich,

that the Catholic and Protestant Armenians, who had by and large not been involved in any revolutionary movements, would be allowed to return to their homes as far as possible. [1915-12-18-DE-001]

Vice-Consul Hoffmann then reports from Aleppo:


A new possibility seemed to open up for some Armenians of non-Gregorian faith after the Minister of Naval Affairs, Djemal Pasha, had intervened on their behalf. Consul Roessler:
But Centre politician Matthias Erzberger establishes in a memo:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich speaks of occasional success:
A few weeks later Wolff-Metternich must once again qualify his report:
Those Turkish who were in charge made no distinction between the various denominations of the Armenians. Ernst I. Christoffel, the manager of Malatia, the home for the blind, took stock of the Protestant and Catholic Armenians’ dismal situation:
A small parish of Catholic Armenians was kept up in Angora, today the capital city of Ankara. This was possibly due to the intervention of Dr. David, the Catholic army chaplain in Angora, who had reported to influential Centre politician Erzberger that
Secretary of State Zimmermann then requested of the embassy that
Kuehlmann, the Ambassador in Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, reported back on the basis of his own investigations that the government was
(V) From the Collection Points to the Death Camps

1) The Collection Points

According to German reports, there were several collection points for the deported Armenians. In October 1915, Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports from Alexandrette on some of them after he represented Roessler in Aleppo, thereby getting a good idea of the situation, because according to Hoffmann,

thanks to its central position, Aleppo is still the focal point of the deportation of the Armenians and, therefore, a particularly suitable location for gaining an overall picture of the occurrences.

The nearest destination up to now for the deportees arriving from the north and north-east were the stations Tell-Abiad, Rass-el-Ain and (for Aintab and Marasch) Aktsche-Koejuenli on the Baghdad Railway, then Aleppo . According to reports by the government, at the end of October about 20000 people were accommodated in Aleppo; only a few of them were in individual homes (at their own expense), the largest part in caravansaries (”khans”) or in open field camps on the outskirts of the town. The convoys arriving from Central, North and West Anatolia are streaming into the collection camp near Ma’mureh (alongside the Baghdad Railway in the Vilayet Adana) and on to the one in Katma (48 kms to the north-west of Aleppo by the Baghdad Railway). By the end of October, according to official government reports, about 40000 deportees had collected there.


This situation did not yet change fundamentally during the following two months, but Roessler intimated that the concentration camps were only a temporary solution:
For a long time Aleppo itself was without doubt the most important collection camp. Consul Roessler had already reported in July:
Two months later Roessler reports on new trains:
Then the procession of deportees through Aleppo stopped. Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports that the Turkish authorities have
Consul Roessler also reported on other camps, such as, for example, Katma:
Concerning the collection camp of Islahiye, Roessler was able to report:
2) The Death Trains along the Euphrates River

a) Settlement Attempts

There had obviously been attempts during the first weeks of deportation to settle the Armenians in Muslim villages, even if they were scattered. Thus, Roessler reports from Aleppo:


Ambassador Wangenheim confirms his consul’s report:
Little can be found in the German sources on the fate of these people who were originally settled. In the spring of 1916, the German nun, Paula Schaefer, reported on her sphere of work:
Roessler describes other, earlier settlement attempts and the consequence:
Roessler is able to report the following on further cases from the surrounding area:
A German who was sent by Roessler to Deir-es-Zor reports on a relatively important settlement in Sabcha:
Sabcha was, at best, an attempt at a settlement which was soon given up again. Less than one year later, Vice-Consul Hoffmann quotes a German officer who has travelled the Euphrates stretch for a long time and knows it well:
b) The Death Marches in the South and South-East

The streams of refugees divided beyond Aleppo and east of the provincial capital. While a smaller part of the deported Armenians was driven on in the direction of Palastina, those responsible for the genocide directed the larger part along the Euphrates river (first through Aleppo, later by-passing Aleppo via Bab and Meskene) to Deir-es-Zor and also further in the direction of Baghdad as well as Mossul, furthermore via Tell Abiad and Ras ul Ain to Mossul. Vice-Consul Hoffmann describes the routes:


The Germans have only a few reports from Palastina , also because only a smaller part of the Armenians had been deported directly to the south of Aleppo. At any rate, the figures quoted by the German consulates give a break-down on the situation:

Consul Loytved-Hardegg reports from Damascus:


The consulate in Damascus reports to the embassy:
Consul Loytved-Hardegg in Damascus reports on a conversation with Hussein Kasim Bey, the commissioner responsible for the Armenians:
In turn, the Consul General in Jerusalem reports after a visit from the Patriarch:
Sister Beatrice Rohner reported again on the suffering of these deportees:
Beatrice Rohner received similar reports from Hama. A preacher wrote to her:
Consul Loytved-Hardegg from Damascus gives a final overview on the deported Armenians in his area of responsibility:
Concerning the transports to Tell Abiad and Ras ul Ain , the German engineer, Bastendorff wrote about Ras ul Ain:
Lechnig, a clerk in the consulate, reports on the camp at Tel Abiad:
But the true horror route is the Euphrates route to Deir-es-Zor. Vice-Consul Holstein reports from there:
Roessler reports that the government has ordered
In one of the first reports on these death routes, Roessler writes:
One of the Germans sent by Roessler to Deir-es-Zor reports on the deportation routes:
Roessler:
The German Consul, Wilhelm Litten, travelled from Baghdad to Aleppo and describes the route in the direction opposite to the deportation trains:
The only German consul to travel on this death route along the Euphrates closes his observations with these remarks:
Consul Roessler:
Sister Beatrice Rohner:
Beatrice Rohner gathered from a letter
Beatrice Rohner reports that Wartan Yeramaie, a preacher, wrote from Haman:
The consulate in Mossul reports:
Roessler:
Vartan Geranian, the Armenian preacher from Hamam, informs Sister Rohner:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann quotes a German officer who has travelled along the Euphrates route for a long time and knows it well:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann gives an account of the assessment of a German who visited all of the camps:
Even when the deportations had, for all practical purposes, finished at the beginning of 1917, Roessler reports:
Roessler writes that in Rakka a representative of the American consulate had
The largest town on the death route and a place of settlement for some time is Deir-es-Zor . As early as July 1915, Roessler reports on a concentration of Armenian deportees in the desert town:
A German sent by Roessler to Deir-es-Zor makes the following report on the town:
Consul Wilhelm Litten reports on Deir-es-Zor:
Consul Roessler reports:
Three months later Roessler reports:
Araxia Djibedjian, an Armenian woman, writes in a letter from Deir-es-Zor to Beatrice Rohner:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann quotes a German officer who has travelled along the Euphrates route for a long time and knows it well:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann gives an account of the assessment of a German who visited all of the camps:
c) Acts of Annihilation

The Chabur river, which flows into the Euphrates south-east of Deir-es-Zor, was indeed to become one of the most gruesome places of death for the deported Armenians who had survived until that time. But it was not the only gruesome place.

Another place was Tell Ermen ; as early as July 1915, Ambassador Wangenheim reports on its fate:


Vice-Consul Hoffmann includes observations made by his colleague Holstein, who reported that in Tell-Ermen
It was not Holstein’s only discovery on his journey to Aleppo. Vice-Consul Hoffmann writes:
Consul Roessler reports on another massacre not far from Tell Ermen:
One of Roessler’s reports gives an inkling of what happened in other deportation towns along the murderous Euphrates:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann learned the following about those Armenians stranded in Deir-es-Zor:
Roessler was able to obtain late confirmation. He sent his superiors

Chapter 3: Pretexts for the Genocide and Defences

Even in the relatively closed off Ottoman Empire, it was hardly possible to openly propagate the genocide of Christian minorities, in particular the Armenians, as a political goal. Thus, the government had to give both its own people and its allies real or supposed reasons which seemed to justify the strict measures taken against the Armenians. And the Armenians’ obvious defences had to be reinterpreted as revolts in order to give proof later for the Armenians’ supposedly traiterous attitude.

(I) The Pretexts

The Turkish accusations concerning treason followed two lines of argumentation: on the one hand, the Armenians had shown sympathy for the enemy Entente; on the other hand they had planned and carried out a conspiracy against the state. The Young Turk regime attempted to establish a causality between the two lines.

(1) Sympathy for the Entente

The majority of the Armenians – and the German diplomats were also of this opinion – had much more sympathy for the countries which made up the Entente (England, France and Russia), i.e. the war-time enemies of Turkey and Germany, than for the authoritarian regimes with which Turkey was allied. There were a number of historical reasons for this, but especially, of course, the fact that England and France symbolised a democracy which was very popular with the Armenians, but which the Germans despised. There is a reference in the files which is almost amusing.

In a long report, Ambassador Wolff-Metternich describes how the Armenian Great National Council functions and remarks on its constitution:


In accordance with the situation in the empire at that time, the title ” ultra-democratic“ was meant in an extremely critical way. The Germans compared this characteristic trait of the Gregorian Armenians with the laudable features of those Armenians whom they had converted to Protestantism and Catholicism and who were very obedient to authority, as is right and proper. For this reason Wolff-Metternich also established in the following passages:
The source of the support of the Porte, the Ottoman government, lay in the Young Turks, who, as ardent followers of the French Revolution, once set out to introduce a democracy of a Western calibre in Turkey. Based on the French model, the Young Turks named their united party the “Union for Unity and Progress”; it was organised in “committees” in which French was often spoken. The Young Turks shared this sympathy with the majority of the Armenians. Scheubner-Richter, the German Vice-Consul in Erzerum, also ascertained a French influence, particularly in the educational system:
While the Armenians continued to hold fast to their pro-French sympathies, the pro-French views of the Young Turk committee members now at war with the former ideological mother country led to some problems, and this was one of the causes for their contempt towards the German Empire , a fact which has also been determined by the German observers.

Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter speaks in a report of the


The director and deputy chairman of the German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient, Friedrich Schuchardt, writes:
Even if the Young Turks and Francophile Armenians pursued similar political goals for a certain period, the Young Turks used the Armenians’ preference for the Entente against them during the war. Armenian partners at the discussions attempted to play this down, especially towards the Germans. The Armenian Patriarch, Zaven, spoke to the German ambassador in Constantinople, Hans Baron von Wangenheim, on the Armenians’ attitude to the Entente powers. Von Wangenheim reports:
According to Wangenheim’s report, Consul Buege from Adana even showed understanding for the Armenians and estimated that
Patriarch Zaven attempted to differentiate and interpret the influence of the Entente powers. Wangenheim on his discussion with him:
Consul Roessler reported from Aleppo that Djelal Bey, the Wali from Aleppo, had informed him
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter judged such sympathy less dramatically when he writes that the Turkish Armenians have always regarded Russia as “their natural protector”. In addition, Russia had
Consul Bergfeld reports from Trapezunt:
Naturally, sympathies do not yet mean secession. The German journalist, von Tyszka:
These matter-of-fact assessments on the part of the German diplomats and observers are in contrast to the explanations given by the head of the German Foreign Office – although admittedly these are meant more for public use – to the parliamentary committee in which only money and espionage were accepted as motives by German policitians, although this was by no means untypical for that time. At the 86th session of the Imperial Budget Committee on 29 September 1916, Undersecretary of State Zimmermann argued before the German parliamentarians:
(2) Accusation of Treason against the Armenians

Zimmermann’s statements showed the direction in which the Young Turks, but also Germany in its official position, attempted to justify the deportations: Turkish Armenians had hatched plans for revolt, acquired weapons, cut telegraph wires and sided with the enemy – in short: they had betrayed their native country and risen against the Ottoman Empire. Soon there was no longer talk of rebellious Armenians, but of the entire Armenian people having risen against the Turks. But what is most conspicuous is that these accusations of treason were made almost solely by official Turkish and German sides, while generally the observers on the spot reached completely different conclusions. In the beginning, German consuls were also among those giving warnings, but their statements show that they produced hardly any evidence, merely passing on Turkish accusations.

There were reports or fears of revolts even before the events in Wan. After the bombardment of Trapezunt by the Russian fleet, Consul Bergfeldt reports:


Without basing this on the reports of his consuls, Ambassador Wangenheim reports to Berlin:
In his next report on revolts Wangenheim openly names his sources:
Some months later and obviously based only on Turkish sources, Wangenheim again reports that the Armenians were
Furthermore, according to Ambassador Wangenheim, it was being said
Scheubner-Richter reports from Erzerum, clearly stating his sources, that the Wali believes
Wangenheim reports, although not on the basis of German, but obviously Turkish or party statements, that
Only in one report does Scheubner-Richter speak of an accumulation of weapons which could have been used in a revolt:
Two reports from the embassy in Constantinople confirm that the reports on imminent revolts and acts of treason by the Armenians definitely come from the Turkish side. Consul General Mordtmann, responsible for Armenian affairs at the German embassy, noted after a discussion with the Minister of the Interior, Talaat:
Enver, the Minister of War, made the same accusations to Wangenheim, who reported to the German Foreign Office:
Official Turkish sources obviously spread this version throughout the country. Germany’s representative, Kuckhoff, an elected vice-consul who mastered the rules of his trade only in a very unsatisfactory manner, reports from Samsun without having made any observations at all in his administrative district, i.e. purely from hearsay:
Wangenheim then tones down his consul’s report and concludes from it, that
Just how far the phantasies of the Turkish informers went and the willingness of the Germans to take them seriously – or their being accomplices – is demonstrated by the German naval attaché, Hans Humann, who reports after a conversation with his close friend, Enver:
Only once does a German officer, Lieutenant Colonel Stange, report on cases of espionage which, however, he himself had not experienced either:
Ambassador Paul Count Wolff-Metternich reports for the first time at the end of 1915 that the Turkish government definitely intends to “punish” all the Armenians, i.e. to deport and annihilate them, and not just the truly or supposedly guilty. He also quotes his source, the Grand Vizier, who told him:
Wolff-Metternich repeats statements made by the Minister of the Interior, Talaat Pascha, which had the same drift:
Consul Roessler reports that the Mutessarif of Marash said to a German nun:
Dazu erklärt Rößler, in Aleppo
Not surprisingly, at the 86th session of the Imperial Budget Committee on 29 September 1916, the highest representative of the German Foreign Office, Arthur Zimmermann, repeats the quasi-official version:
Finally, it was again one of the Young Turk statesmen, Djemal Pascha, who affirmed in a conversation with representatives of German Christians in Berlin that with regard to the Armenians,
None of these Turkish-German statements on an Armenian endangering of the Ottoman nation is confirmed by the German observers on the spot. Their statements are clear: In each administrative district of the German consuls there was no Armenian revolt against the Ottoman Empire worthy of the name. If there was talk of revolt, or more especially of one revolt, it was of the one in Van which no German diplomat had observed himself and, thus, could testify to, because there was no consul there. And this also held for Bitlis and Musch, which are cited in some documents as towns of revolt. The observers’ statements are based on general assessments due to their intimate knowledge and go as far as detailed investigations, insofar as local accusations are concerned.

Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports from Alexandrette, known today as Iskenderun:


On the basis of the reports by his consuls, Ambassador Wangenheim writes:
Johann Mordtmann, who was responsible for the Armenian matters, gives a report on a discussion with General Posseldt, who is stationed in Erzerum and who
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter reports from Erzerum on the deportations:
The head of the orphanage, Johannes Ehmann, reports from Kharput (in the absence of a German consul) on the situation and determines that
According to Ehmann, the Wali of Mamuret ul Aziz was
In a further letter Scheubner-Richter notes
In the same report Scheubner-Richter writes:
And one day later the Vice-Consul gives his impression from Erzerum:
Three months later, Scheubner-Richter writes that in his administrative district
Lieutenant Colonel Stange, stationed in Erzerum, backs him up.
Discoveries of bombs are also used again and again as proof of Armenian conspiracies. Scheubner-Richter passes on a report which does not, however, come from his administrative district:
Wangenheim also refers to Turkish sources which report from Van:
After a conversation with the Armenian Patriarch, Mordtmann made a note concerning the discovery of bombs, that in Everek, near Kaisarie,
Based on Turkish sources, Wangenheim reports:
And two days later:
At the end of May, Wangenheim reports to Berlin:
His consul in Erzerum was able to verify this statement and reports:
Some Armenians had obviously also hidden bombs, but these were of little use for a revolt. In general, the discovery of weapons among the Armenians proves very little. After investigations in Constantinople, von Tyszka, the German journalist, writes:
Ambassador Kuehlmann in a later report on the discovery of bombs:
The German consuls were able to investigate accusations of conspiracy whenever such accusations referred to events that happened in their administrative districts. Roessler did so in a case where the Turks claimed there was a connection between the Armenians in Dörtyol and in Zeitun:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann, who resided in Alexandrette, was able to clear up another case:
Many of the impressions of the German diplomats and observers on the spot as well as their experience with the Turkish ally then led to their reaching a fairly unanimous conclusion in their summaries , namely, that there was very little or nothing at all to the Turkish theories on a conspiracy. Scheubner-Richter writes:
The German Protestant Christians in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann:
(II) The Defences

Whenever German observers thought of actual or supposed revolts, they always spoke only of the case in Van which they could not investigate (no doubt the success of the Turkish powers of persuasion), but they also realised that, generally, the Armenians were merely using armed clashes to try and protect themselves against their imminent annihilation. Scheubner-Richter:


Well over a year later, during a ride through eastern Anatolia as leader of a military convoy which included both German and Turkish officers as well as men, the German Vice-Consul had personally experienced how uprisings did, in fact, arise. Scheubner-Richter reports on an order
Correctly recognising cause and effect, Wangenheim’s deputy and the Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission, Prince Hohenlohe-Langenburg, also reports on military acts by Armenians:
Roessler and Hoffmann report from their fields of work on the supposed uprisings by the Armenians. Roessler:
There is hardly any information on Fundadyak in the documents selected by Lepsius and even these references had been deleted in the publication. The only report is that of the German nun, Paula Schaefer, who was working in Marash and reported from there:
Roessler himself writes about Suediye , the defence of which animated the German author, Franz Werfel, to write his novel on Armenia, “The Forty Days of Musa Dagh”:
Of the three defences, the events in Urfa are best verified by German files. Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports:
A short while later Roessler describes the course of events in Urfa in detail and comments:
Roessler was particularly outraged at the report by the ”Norddeutsche Allgemeine” which printed the Turkish version of the revolt in Urfa and partly contained completely untrue statements. According to Roessler, the decisive factor in favour of the battle was that the Armenians
The “Norddeutsche Zeitung“ was the semi-official organ of the German government and reflected rather exactly the policy Germany officially took. In the documents selected by Lepsius, this policy is especially apparent in the statement of account by Zimmermann, the head of the German Foreign Office. In a memo he wrote for a discussion with the Grand Duchess of Baden at the end of September 1916, he noted:
This opinion could not be substantiated by the reports from the German representatives in the province; however, it was by the reports from a bird of paradise, a resident minister who was only tolerantly smiled at by his fellow consuls in Turkey, and head of the “News Agency for the Middle East”, Baron Max von Oppenheim . He had as little knowledge of the Middle East as he had great influence in Berlin, especially with the emperor. Sometimes, however, the ambassadors in Constantinople repeated his opinion. This was the case for Wangenheim’s successor, Baron von Neurath. He had reported:
It was Oppenheim who made three traitors out of the Armenian Torosoglu Agop, who had been branded as a traitor: Toros, Oglu and Agop. And it was he who maintained that Armenian traitors had caused trains to derail in Alexandrette, although this had, in fact, been done by a British cruiser without any assistance from the Armenians at all. "Without doubt, in the course of a temporary enemy landing which led to the destruction of the railway line from Alexandrette, espionage and other services were carried out," Oppenheimer had reported, whereupon Consul Hoffmann derisively remarked:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann further on the baron's skills of fantasy:
While Oppenheim drew his information from extremely dubious sources, Consul Roessler was very well informed on the events in Urfa, particularly through information he received from the Swiss deacon working in Urfa, Kuenzler, which he includes in one of his letters:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Alexandrette gives a closing comment on the supposed conspiracies in the Mediterranean region:

Chapter 4: The Policy of the Final Solution

Germany was the closest ally of the Ottoman Empire. Contacts which took place almost daily between German diplomats and Turkish partners led to a series of references on the real reasons why the Young Turks wanted to destroy the Armenians as a nation, and their motives. They were also aware of efforts undertaken by the Young Turk leaders to hush up the reality of a planned genocide: by means of counter-orders which were obviously only meant as a deception, as far as simply denying the genocide.

(I) The Collision Course

It is not clear from the German diplomatic sources when the decision concerning the Armenian genocide was made by the Turkish leaders. However, the German sources did show the change towards an ultra-nationalistic policy.

1) The Policy of the Young Turks

The break from the mutuality with Armenian politicians to their persecution and murder was outwardly characterised by the assignment of reforms for the Armenian provinces which had been worked out by the Great Powers, especially Russia and Germany, in the embassy discussions in Constantinople. These reforms were to give the Armenians certain autonomous rights and, thus, protection against despotic acts by the Turkish administration, as had been common in the past. Ambassador Hans Baron von Wangenheim describes the termination of the contract with Hoff and Westenenk, politicians who were intended to become general inspectors for the Armenian provinces


Minister of the Interior Talaat Pascha justified the arrests on 24 and 25 April towards the first dragoman of the German Embassy as follows:
Consul General Mordtmann, responsible for reporting on the Armenians, reports after a conversation with the Minister of the Interior that Talaat
In a further conversation with Mordtmann, Talaat said:
The German journalist, von Tyszka, especially noticed the manner in which the Young Turk rulers were pursuing their ultra-nationalistic goal. He writes:
The Turkish newspaper, “Teswiri Efkiar” ( No. 1886 dated 7 October 1916) reported on the swing by the Young Turks’ executive leaders from a co-existence with the minorities to their annihilation. The chargé d’affaires in Constantinople, Legation Councillor Radowitz, comments that this article reaches the conclusion
“Teswiri Efkiar” demands that Turkey must
The typical conclusion of the nationalistic newspaper, which can hardly be outdone in its cynicism:
Vice-Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, who not only witnessed deportations in Erzerum, but also knew exactly the opinion of the local residential prominent advocates and organisers of the genocide, summarises his impressions in an extensive report:
Scheubner-Richter further on the motives of those Young Turks responsible for the genocide:
Scheubner-Richter was convinced that the annihilation of the Armenians was not the only item on the programme of the Young Turk agitators. In his report he writes:
The reverse conclusion given in a report by the Ambassador in Extraordinary Mission, Richard von Kuehlmann, was that the nationalistic line taken by the Young Turks determined the policy towards the Armenians. After Talaat’s appointment as Grand Vizier, Kuehlmann writes:
In a memo he wrote for a conversation with the Grand Duchess of Baden at the End of September 1916, the Secretary of State of the German Foreign Office, Zimmermann, also had to concede the guilt of the Young Turks:
2) The Role of the Turkish Military

Possibly, the deportation and extensive annihilation of the Armenians was decided upon by the Young Turks, but it was also supported by the Turkish military – if it was not actually, at least in part, the initiator, for example in the region of Erzerum. Although it also partly justified the deportations on the basis of military necessity, it went far beyond the necessary steps as far as open propagation of the annihilation of the Armenians. Because Erzerum was one of the most important, if not the most important regional centre of genocide, the German diplomatic reports on the role of the military go back at the beginning to the Administrator and Vice-Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter who, as he himself was an active officer, was able to give authentic reports on the intentions of his Turkish colleagues.

Already before 24 April, Scheubner-Richter reports from Erzerum:


After 24 April, he speaks of
One day later:
The Vice-Consul continues:
Less than one month later he reports:
Scheubner-Richter reports that the
A week later, the German Vice-Consul writes that the Vali had assured him that the responsibility for the deportations was not
Lieutenant Colonel Stange, stationed in Erzerum, also confirmed that the military took the initiative in the deportations.
But the leaders of the Turkish army were also involved in the annihilation of the Armenians in other areas. Vice-Consul Holstein reports from Mossul:
And Consul Roessler reports that the army also seems to have ordered deportations in his administrative district of Aleppo. He writes that the Armenians from Aintab were deported
A letter from the Consulate Secretary, Werth, who wanted to obtain an exemption for Armenians employed by Germans, shows that even the highest military posts in Erzerum continued to rigorously deport the Armenians:
(II) The Motives for the Annihilation of the Armenians

1) Gains

The Armenians in Turkey were considered to be hard-working and rich. This stimulated the greed to enrich oneself at their expense. Although such gains are a little-known motive for the annihilation of the Armenians, they have been ascertained again and again by German observations.

An eye witness had reported to Roessler:


Johann Mordtmann, the expert on Armenians at the German Embassy in Constantinople, clearly states in a memo as one of the
Time and again deportation trains were plundert, and there is evidence of this in many documents. Here are just two examples. An eye witness reported to Roessler:
The population of those regions took part in these gains, through which the Armenian deportees had to pass. Especially those people profited, who exercised power over the Armenians. Here are another two examples. Lieutenant Colonel Stange reports that the
At the intervention of the German Baghdad Railway official, Bastendorff, two Armenian employees were able to return to their job:
In those towns which the Armenians had left, the population helped itself. The wife of the head of the orphanage in Kharput, Mrs. Ehmann, writes:
But especially those people profitted from the disappearance of the Armenians, who had ordered and carried out the deportations. This already held for the Armenians who had to leave their place of residence before the mass deportations began. The German missionary, Blank, reports on the deportees from Zeitun:
The greatest riches of the deported Armenians lay in their real estate and the goods the traders had to leave behind. The Young Turks who carried out such dispossessions as well as their accomplices had their eyes particularly on these objects. Consul Bergfeld reports from Trapezunt on the Armenians’ estates which – for the time being – were confiscated by the government:
Lieutenant Colonel Stange reports:
Consul Bergfeld reports from Trapezunt:
They were not mistaken. In his next report, Bergfeld writes:

With little exception, public officials and police divisions are enriching themselves during the vacation of the Armenian houses in the most shameless way. [1915-08-27-DE-013]

Bergfeld speaks of the


No one in the ministries in Constantinople planned to return confiscated goods. Ambassador Wolff-Metternich made a request to the Ministry of the Interior for the return of a certain group of Armenians. His partners in discussion explained to him:
Turkish politicians or the state not only enriched themselves on the estates of the Armenians, but they also fleeced the business partners of the deportees. Vice-Consul Hoffmann speaks of
The director of the Deutsche Bank then mockingly comments on the liquidation law, the so-called “Loi provisoire”, according to which the estates of the deported Armenians are to be settled:
Consul Count Spee reports from Smyrna:
Sometimes the avarice of the local Turks aided the Armenians. Thus, Vice-Consul Hoffmann suspects that the Armenians from Aleppo owed their greatly being spared up to this point

mainly to the resistance of those local circles who would suffer great losses of money if they disappeared. [1916-01-03-DE-001]

2) The Will of the Turkish Hardliners to Destroy

The elimination of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire could not have been achieved solely by means of goading peoples’ greed. Those responsible for the genocide went several steps further. They not only deported and killed those they suspected of resisting the authority of the state, of causing revolts and of treason, they also went as far as jointly and severally confining an entire people for the possible crimes of individuals.

Consul Roessler complained:


One day later Roessler writes:
Vice-Consul Kuckhoff from Samsun:
Consul Roessler writes that the Turkish government
Lieutenant Colonel Stange is outraged over “the authorities” for they seem
As a matter of course, political or military leaders ordered the arrests of entire clans in which entire families of the supposed guilty or even entire social classes were to make amends. Ambassador Neurath cites a case in which he requested that Armenians working for the Germans and, thus, an ally be saved. The Turkish general (Fakhri Pasha) responsible
With regard to the reactions of the most important Young Turks, Ambassador Wolff-Metternich says:
According to Wolff-Metternich, Minister of the Interior Talaat told him in a conversation:
Wolff-Metternich was surprised by Talaat and his colleagues:
Even in a highly official answer by the Supreme Porte to petitions by the German embassy, the Turkish government speaks of “measures against the Armenian population” and not against those responsible for certain deeds:
Ernst I. Christoffel, the head of Malatia, the home for the blind, on the Armenian people, usually called “nation” in the Ottoman Empire:
This Armenian “nation” was a part of the Ottoman Empire, and the oldest by far. In the 19th century, the Turkish sultan, Abdul Hamid, had already directed his hatred of the Armenians towards the entire nation. According to Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter, the Turkish government now
The hatred of the Armenians is a constantly recurring phrase in the German sources. Four passages in the documents can be used as examples.

An eye witness reported to Roessler:


Lieutenant Colonel Stange reports that the deportation of the Armenians from Erzerum was
The German engineer, Bastendorff, describes a scene at the railway station in Ras-ul-Ain:
In another passage Bastendorff writes:
Undersecretary of State Zimmermann also had to admit:
There are clear references in the German reports to a collective intention to kill on the part of the Turkish hardliners. One of the most critical observers of the genocide, Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter, speaks in one of his reports of the
In the files, he describes who is striving for this final solution and how, in his opinion, this goal can be achieved: according to Scheubner-Richter, the supporters of the local committee
The goal of this group was
Ambassador Wangenheim, who usually tends to be more cautious, confirms his opinion:
Consul Roessler from Aleppo:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports from Aleppo on 300000 Armenians who are to be deported to the south:
Bastendorff, the German engineer at the Baghdad Railway, writes in a report to Roessler, which the German consul approved of and sent on to Berlin:
Roessler reports from Aleppo, where the headquarters for the final solution for the Armenians was located:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann states more precisely:
(III) The Dimension of the Genocide

If the statements of the German diplomats and their informants on the individual aspects of the deportations already verify that the decimation resp. annihilation of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire was the main goal of the Young Turks, then the key quotations, including those of the German diplomats and observers, make it clear that, in their opinion, the deportations constituted genocide.

Scheubner-Richter from Erzerum:


Consul Bergfeld from Trapezunt:
Ambassador Wangenheim speaks of
Bergfeld reports that in his administrative district no deportations have yet taken place, but that the signs point to the fact
Vice-Consul Kuckhoff from Samsun writes:
Furthermore, he speaks of the
Consul Roessler writes that the Turkish government is
And, on the same day:
Scheubner-Richter reports that
Scheubner-Richter speaks of the attempt by the Turkish government
The German Vice-Consul from Erzerum writes in another document:
Scheubner-Richter speaks of a
The Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission, Prince Hohenlohe-Langenburg, writes to various German consulates:
In a report to the Imperial Chancellor, Bethmann-Hollweg, Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg speaks of the
as well as of the
The German embassy informs the Ottoman government in a memo that it regrets having to ascertain that incidents
Consul Roessler speaks of the
and reaches the conclusion that
The Germans Seeger, Biegel and other signatories write:

The whole measure seems to be aimed at a complete extermination of the Armenians. [1915-08-21-DE-011]

Lieutenant Colonel Stange on the deportation of the Armenians from Erzerum, even though it was known that the deportation routes were unsafe, resp. that killer troops waited there for the Armenians:


In the same report, Stange says
Stange further suspects that the government was working according to
Hohenlohe-Langenburg quotes Roessler:
Consul Roessler in a letter:
The Legation Councillor in the German Foreign Office who was responsible for Turkey, Frederic Hans von Rosenberg, speaks of the
Von Tyszka, the German journalist:
And:
And:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Aleppo:
Neukirch, the German Red Cross doctor from Ersindjan, reports:
The German Protestant Christians in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor:
They were convinced that
The Mission Board of the Central Committee for the General Meetings of Catholics in Germany speaks of
Foreign Secretary of State Jagow requests that his ambassador lodge a protest with the Turkish government
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich reports:
Wolff-Metternich writes to Bethmann Hollweg that he pointed out to the Grand Vizier that
The Ambassador speaks of
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Alexandrette:
According to Hoffmann,
Hoffmann speaks further of
Lechnig, the clerk at the German Consulate, on the inhabitants of the camp in Tell Abiad who supposedly could not be further deported, because Bedouins besieged the routes:
Martin Niepage, the German secondary school teacher in Aleppo, speaks of
His colleague and school director, Eduard Graeter, on
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich feared,
Consul Roessler speaks of
The Consul of Tabris, Wilhelm Litten, writes after a journey along the death routes of the Armenians:
Matthias Erzberger, the German member of the Reichstag and later Foreign Secretary of State, after a journey to Constantinople:
Consul Roessler:
Consul Loytved Hardegg from Damascus reports on a discussion with the former Wali of Saloniki and Aleppo, Hussein Kasim Bey, who professed the fear that the Armenians
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich:
Ernst Jacob Christoffel, the German vicar:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich on the merging of both Catholicos of Sis and Aghtamar with the Patriarchs of Constantinople and Jerusalem:
In a memo, Undersecretary of State Zimmermann speaks of
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter summarises the deportations:
The Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, Kuehlmann, says:
Finally, one of the heads of German foreign policy, Arthur Zimmermann, had to admit in a report in which he was mainly concerned with playing down the consequences of the deportations and avoiding any allusion to genocide
(IV) The Statistics on the Genocide

There are several statements on the number of deported and murdered Armenians, some of which only refer to certain sections. But they are useful for gaining an impression of the size which the observers on the spot perceived.

Consul Roessler reports:


Already in the middle of 1915, he believed that, according to his own figures:
Consul Buege reports from Adana:
Von Tyszka, the German journalist, refuses to make a projection, because:
On the other hand, the German Protestant Christians include their estimation in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor:
Concerning the total number of victims, the Protestant Christians write:
The Chairman of the German-Armenian Association, Johannes Lepsius, speaks
The Reichstag parliamentarian, Matthias Erzberger, received a report from two “intermediary agents who were absolutely sure”:
Based on the investigations of the Swiss nun, Rohner, the Chargé d’ Affaires of the Embassy in Constantinople, Radowitz, projects the total figure of the victims and confronts her with the figures which are making the rounds in the capital city:
The head of Malatia, the home for the blind, Ernst I. Christoffel, gives an estimation, albeit of necessity a very private one:
The Austrian-Hungarian representative in Tiflis, Georg Baron von and zu Franckenstein, had a discussion with the Minister of the Interior of the Armenian Republic, Aram Manukian, which was documented in the archives of the Foreign Office. Franckenstein:
(V) Covering Up and Denying the Genocide

Even today, the Armenian genocide is denied by those affected, the Turkish government, but also by scientists. This is made easier for those who deny the genocide, at least it seems to be so, by orders and counter-orders given by the Ottoman leaders, who used this method as a general attempt to hush up the crimes they ordered to be carried out. The assessment of such orders is made difficult by the fact that, at least according to German sources, one of the most important members of the triumvirate did not completely support the official standpoint which was oriented towards the annihilation of the Armenians: the Minister of Naval Affairs and Supreme Commander of the 4th Army, stationed in the south, Djemal Pascha.

Roessler reports that already before the beginning of the deportations on a large scale, Djemal Pascha had given orders


The French version of Djemal’s order was as follows:
Later, Djemal continued to carry out this policy, even though it was toned down. Roessler reports from Aleppo:
Statements made and orders given by the Young Turk leaders are definitely of a different calibre and, considering the reports made by the German observers, they can only be regarded as cynical.

Mordtmann, the Armenian expert, notes after a discussion with Talaat:


Consul Bergfeld reports from Trapezunt:
Roessler reports that there were at least two different orders which cancelled each other:
Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg reports from Constantinople:
It is, indeed, amazing just how long the German official posts attached great importance to these counter-orders. Ambassador Hohenlohe reports again that counter-orders have been given, seemingly as a concession, although his report carries a slightly sceptical undertone:
Otto Robert Moritz Goeppert, the Legation Councillor and Council Spokesman at the Foreign Office in Berlin who was “on temporary assignment” to the embassy in Constantinople to deputise for Ambassador Kuehlmann while the latter was on holiday, also saw no trap and reports:
Mordtmann, the embassy’s Armenian expert, reports:
The German Embassy in Constantinople telegraphs to various consulates:
Mordtmann added a further piece of information to the files which he placed in quotation marks, considering the fact that during the event cited completely defenceless Armenians faced heavily armed Turks; namely
This was the extent of the mistrust found in the German embassy in Constantinople at this point. It was only the German representatives on the spot who realised the true value of these counter-orders. Consul Buege from Adana answers:
Only now did Ambassador Hohenlohe also recognise the two-sided nature of these orders, and he telegraphs to the Foreign Office that several events were
When Consul Roessler in Aleppo, for his part, demonstrated the ambiguity of the counter-orders, which were only given after the deportation of the Catholic and Protestant Armenians:
the embassy in Constantinople answered rather abashedly:
Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg now also had to report to Berlin that he had been deceived:
The following telegram had previously been received from Consul Roessler:
Hohenlohe-Langenburg had to admit once again:
The ban on taking photographs is an example of just how much those Turks responsible for the genocide wished to destroy all traces of their deeds. Consul Roessler reports:
On 10 September 1915, the Turkish Military Commissioner sent the following letter to the Chief Engineer of Building Department III of the Baghdad Railway:
Von Tyszka, the German journalist, demonstrated another variant on the deceptions:
In a discussion with Rosenberg, the clerk at the German Foreign Office, the Councillor at the Turkish Embassy in Berlin, Edhem Bey, presumed to claim that:
Rosenberg had commented on the discussion with Edhem without making any critical remarks. After the murder of Armenians in Djeziré, Ambassador Wangenheim was definitely more careful when he repeated Talaat’s answer; the latter had stated:
However, Ambassador Wolff-Metternich states dryly:
But it was just the German diplomats in Constantinople who gladly agreed with the declarations of the Young Turk leaders, because they saw in this some success for their attempts to attain relief for the Armenians. Even the critical Wolff-Metternich is no exception:
Matthias Erzberger, the Centre politician, was also taken in by these promises. After discussions with Enver and Talaat, he notes:
But that was indeed going too far for the German ambassador. Wolff-Metternich on Erzberger’s report:
Wolff-Metternich, some weeks later:
After reading Sister Beatrice Rohner’s statistics, Radowitz, the Legation Councillor, had to admit:
The Legation Councillor Goeppert also had to admit that he had been deceived:
After the Armenians had practically been annihilated, Kuehlmann, the Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, fell back once again into the old naivety:
A week later, Kuehlmann rose to repeat a comment made by the newly appointed Grand Vizier, Talaat Pascha, which can hardly be outdone for its cynicism:
It was especially those German diplomats who were on the spot who spoke bluntly and did not allow themselves to be deceived. What outraged them the most were the unheard-of lies which the Turkish press served its readers, and which were repeated without comment or reservations by the German newspapers which were dependent on the government. Some of these newspaper articles are commented thus by Vice-Consul Holstein:
Consul Roessler made a bitter verbal attack in order to give vent to his indignation after he had read an explanation from the official Turkish news agency, “Milli”, in the official German “Norddeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung”. Roessler:

Chapter 5: Those Responsible for the Genocide

Who was the driving force behind the Armenian genocide? The German diplomatic sources seldom go into this directly. But there are a number of references, some of them hidden, which show who the German observers considered to be the initiators of the deportations and the annihilation of the Armenians. Sometimes there is just talk of “from above”, sometimes of the “ government”, but for the most part of the Young Turk Party (“Ittihad ve Terakki”), i.e. the “Union for Unity and Progress”, or generally of the Young Turk “committees” or “clubs”.

(I) The Initiators

1) The Leadership in Constantinople

The German observers or their informants often did not know who exactly issued the orders, when they wrote ”from above“ or “from Constantinople“. They then often indicated “the government”, although especially in the case of the observers in the provinces it was not always clear whether they actually meant the government as such or simply the leaders. Thus, the team of leaders of the Young Turks, the radical wing of the party, the triumvirate Talaat, Enver and Djemal, or only one of them are sometimes concealed behind the “government”. The decisive factor was that these were orders, instructions or directives “from above”.

Roessler reported that the Vali from Aleppo, Djelal Bey, had said to him


Consul Bergfeld reports from Trebizond:
Prince Hohenlohe-Langenburg, Wangenheim’s deputy, speaks in a report of a
Without stating explicitly who he is talking about, Consul Buege from Adana speaks of the
Consul Roessler from Aleppo writes:
Chargé d’Affaires Radowitz reports that the Vali of Smyrna said that
The Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, Kuehlmann, presents a memo from Liman von Sanders on the deportation of the Armenians from Smyrna:
2) The Role of the Young Turks

In many cases, however, the references to “above” definitely concern the Young Turk Party itself, the committees and the clubs. Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter reported on the “purging of the Erserum plain” by “irregulars”, as he calls them:


Wangenheim writes that the Armenians made responsible for these events:
General Posseldt, the German commander of the fortress in Erzerum,
Sometimes references to Young Turk committees are only recognisable as such through additional remarks, for example, that the protagonists spoke French to each other, which was typical for the Young Turks. The consul in Trebizond, Bergfeld, reports on the German wartime volunteer, Schlimme, who rode the Erzerum-Ersindjan-Trebizond route on horseback and reported that
Furthermore, Bergfeld reports that
Ambassador Wangenheim:
Scheubner-Richter himself reports that the action, which was comparatively mild in the beginning,
Concerning the men behind the Erzerum Committee, Scheubner-Richter writes:
The German vice-consul continues in his report:
Lieutenant Colonel Stange, stationed in Erzerum, had important insider information:
Consul Bergfeld in Trebizond holds the Young Turks indirectly responsible:
Consul Roessler made the same observations in Aleppo. He writes:
Consul Buege from Adana reports that
Wangenheim reports on the Armenian doctor, Djilinguirian, who was one of the Armenian intellectuals arrested on 24 April 1915 and who died under mysterious circumstances.
Chargé d’Affaires von Radowitz reports.
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter writes about a Turkish officer:
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter speaks of the
The Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, Kuehlmann, held the continued existence of Armenian and Greek revolutionary parties responsible for the conversion of the Young Turk leaders. He writes that this led
Only one German plainly names names: Otto Liman von Sanders. In 1913, the Prussian general was appointed head of the German Military Mission in Turkey and re-organiser of the Turkish army. As Turkish marshal and general in command, he headed the defence of the Dardanelles. Like all German top military personnel, he had important knowledge of internal Turkish affairs, probably more than the top German diplomats. Liman on the ordered deportation of the Armenians from Smyrna:
Talaat

In the opinion of German observers, Minister of the Interior Talaat was, in fact, the person chiefly responsible for the genocide. Consul General Schmidt from Jerusalem reports that the Minister of Naval Affairs and associate in the triumvirate, Djemal, said about Talaat:


Von Tyszka, the German journalist, on Talaat:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich states more precisely:
Von Tyszka characterised Talaat’s personality thus:
Not only did Talaat decree indifferently, but also cynically. According to the Armenian expert at the German embassy in Constantinople, Johann Mordtmann, Talaat told him:
After the majority of the Armenians had been deported or already murdered, the Chargé d’Affaires, Goeppert, notes that Talaat came to the embassy and declared the Armenian question to be settled,
According to Ambassador Wolff-Metternich, Talaat informed him at the height of the actions to kill in the south-east:
Halil

On the other hand, there were also Turkish statesmen at the top level who obviously disapproved of the Armenian genocide. One of these was the President of the Chamber, Halil Bey, who according to Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg seems not to condone the government’s actions against the Armenians and


Said Halim

Grand Vizier Halim was also opposed to the deportations, according to evidence given by the German diplomats. Wolff-Metternich:


Wolff-Metternich reports to Berlin that the Grand Vizier
Djemal

The Minister of Naval Affairs, Djemal Pasha, was obviously more difficult to judge. Ambassador Paul Count Wolff-Metternich about him:


Consul Roessler also reports:
Metternich reports that Consul Loytved from Damascus had spoken with Djemal in connection with the question of forwarding American aid; the latter
However, Djemal’s influence with his colleagues in Constantinople did seem to be limited, and Consul Loytved Hardegg indicated this to Hussein Kasim Bey, the commissioner responsible for the Armenians:
3) Those Responsible in the Provinces:

a) The Agitators

The German consuls and observers knew more about those with whom they often worked together on a daily basis than about those responsible far away in Constantinople.

General Posseldt, the German commander of the fortress in Erzerum, reports:


Lieutenant Colonel Stange, stationed in Erzerum, names those responsible for the genocide in Erzerum:
Roessler from Aleppo:
One of the most cruel Valis was Reschid Bey from Diarbekir. When Vice-Consul Holstein from Mossul complained to the Vali of his region about the deportees from Diarbekir, who had all been killed, the latter said
Ambassador Wangenheim writes in a memo to the Supreme Porte which was given to Talaat personally:
The former Mutessariff of Mardin said to Consul Holstein:
Holstein a short while later:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Aleppo:
In the documents published here there are only short references to other provincial officials. The German official of the tobacco Regie, von Holbach, who has lived in Turkey for many years, reported to Mordtmann, the German Consul General who was responsible for reporting on the Armenians in Turkey, that the Vali of Adana, Hakki Bey,
After a discussion with Alma Johansson in Musch, the Swedish sister in the service of the “German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient” , Mordtmann notes:
Lechnig, the clerk at the German consulate, reports on Ghareb Bey, the Kaimakam responsible for Tell Abiad:
Bastendorff, the German engineer at the Baghdad Railway, reports from Ras ul Ain:
Jakob Kuenzler, the Swiss deacon working in Urfa for German institutions, reports to Roessler, the responsible consul, on a massacre near Urfa with about 1000 Armenian victims:
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter travelled with Turkish Committee members through the east and writes about them:
b) The Moderates

There were several higher provincial officials who opposed the annihilation of the Armenians or at least attempted to alleviate the fate of the deportees. The most well-known among the Valis who refused to take part in the murder of the Armenians was the Governor General of Aleppo, Djelal Bey, who was relieved of his duties because of his mild policies.

Consul Roessler from Aleppo:


Roessler also reports on him:
Tahsin Bey, the Governor General of Erzerum, was another Vali who at least attempted to ease the fate of the Armenian deportees. General Posseldt, the German commander of the fortress in Erzerum, writes about him:
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter often spoke with the Vali and thought highly of him. He writes that Tahsin,
Scheubner-Richter had several discussions with the Vali on the persecution of the Armenians and reports:
The German Red Cross doctor stationed in Ersindjan, Neukirch, reports that several trains full of deported Armenians from Erzerum had arrived in his town in relatively good condition, and writes:
Another Vali who endeavoured to soften the fate of the Armenians was Heidar Bey in Mossul. In connection with the deportees from Diarbekir, who were all killed, Vice-Consul Holstein from Mossul writes:
Vice-Consul Wustrow from Mossul confirms this indirectly when he reports a deterioration in the situation, because
According to evidence given by the German journalist, von Tyszka, the Valis of Smyrna and Adrianople were also moderates:
Apart from the highest officials in the large districts, there were also subordinate sub-prefects and government presidents under them who opposed the deportations, for which some of them paid with their lives.

Vice-Consul Holstein reports from Mossul:


Consul Roessler reports from Aleppo:
And von Tyszka, the German journalist, reports from Constantinople:
Suad Bey, the Mutessarif from Deir-es-Zor, also attempted to assist the Armenians before he was relieved of his post by a Circassian who pursued the annihilation of the few surviving Armenians. Roessler:
(II) The Executives

Those who implemented the genocide were recruited from various fields. On the one hand, the lower officials from the provincial authorities were possible executives. Furthermore, soldiers are mentioned in several reports who took part in the deportations and acts of annihilation. In principle, the gendarmes, who are mentioned in many reports as escorts, were responsible for national security. Like the soldiers, it would have been their job to escort the deportees and, thus, to protect them. But generally they merely drove the defenceless Armenians further along, often using brutal methods, and also took part directly in acts of killing, as is made evident in the German sources. The fourth decisive party were special troops, made up partly of volunteers and partly of recruited prisoners. In some reports they are called “ Djettes” (spelled in various ways) or, according to the old name used in the 19th century, “Bazibazuks”, but also “irregulars” or simply “volunteers”. In several cases, these special troops also appeared as ethnic groups: as “Ashirets”, Kurdish militia, or simply in the form of ethnic groups, Kurds especially and Circassians.

1) Government Agencies

References to the complicity of lower officials are seldom, because it was often a problem to identify them, but there are references to government agencies in general in several places, although just which government agencies are meant remains open.

Consul Roessler reports on corpses “all bound together in the same way, two by two, back to back”, which floated for more than three weeks on the Euphrates river:


Vice-Consul Holstein:
Consul Roessler:
Friedrich Schuchardt, the Director and Deputy Chairman of the German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient, writes to Bethmann Hollweg:
In his report, Roessler calls the deportations
and speaks of the
After the annihilation of the Armenians was practically finished, the Turkish authorities disbanded the central deportation office in Aleppo. Consul Roessler on this point:
2) The Military

According to German sources, both Turkish officers and men also played a role in the implementation of both the deportations as well as the acts of annihilation. Naturally, the German diplomats are careful in matters of a military nature, because during a major war they were required to stay out of all military affairs. However, the sources also give references here to the entanglements of the Turkish military in the genocide.

Blank, the German missionary, reports on an officer who instructed his subordinates:


According to Consul Bergfeld from Trebizond, the German wartime volunteer, Schlimme, reported
Consul Roessler writes on the “unusually well-attested butcheries in Tell Ermen”:
Scheubner-Richter reports on the annihilation of entire deportation trains in the Kemagh gorge:
An Austrian observed:
Lieutenant Colonel Stange writes on the fate of the Armenian men expelled from Trebizond; they were
Vice-Consul Holstein reports on the annihilation of the entire Christian population of Djeziré (in the Vilayet Diarbekir) which took place
Holstein also reports on the arrival of
Bastendorff, the German engineer at the Baghdad Railway, reports on Ras ul Ain:
Roessler writes about a Syrian-Moslem engineer battalion which had been detailled for building bridges:
Paula Schaefer, the German nun from the German Charity-Organisation, puts her observations of the area around Marash on record:
3) The Gendarmes

Generally, the deportation trains were accompanied by gendarmes. This police, responsible for national security, had once been well trained by the French, but then often had to take over other duties. The quality of the new appointments was quite miserable. Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter writes that they


According to the official version, the gendarmes were to protect the Armenians. However, only a few did so. The German sources confirm that things were very different in reality. The wartime volunteer, Carl Schlimme, who accompanied the Armenians placed in his care in June 1915, reports on the action of gendarmes. When he and his companions met up with a deportation train, some of the deportees begged him for bread:
Schlimme said that Turkish people living in the country had told him
Scheubner-Richter reports that during the murder of Armenians in the Kemagh gorge
Consul Roessler writes on Armenians killed in the east:
Roessler reports on maltreatment by the gendarmes which he witnessed in Aleppo when deportees were passing through:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports on observations made by his colleague, Holstein:
Consul Roessler reports:
In a further report Hoffmann writes:
4) Special Organisations and Ethnos

Soldiers and gendarmes could, at least, be recognised because of their uniforms. Special organisations, on the other hand, acted in as secretive a manner as possible. Neither their social nor their ethnic origin were easy to recognise. Nevertheless, there are also references to them in the German sources, sometimes obliquely referred to as gangs or Tshetes. The first references came from the victims themselves. Wangenheim wrote that the Armenian side held the following groups responsible for the occurrences:


Consul Bergfeld reports from Trebizond:
Consul Roessler writes that the Turkish government
In July 1915, Ambassador Wangenheim reports on the murder of Armenians in Tell Ermen; von Mikusch, the German major, reported to Consul Roessler:
Consul Roessler writes that the Turkish government
Lieutenant Colonel Stange reports on the fate of the deportees from Erzerum:
According to Stange, the annihilation of the Armenians was
Vice-Consul Holstein reports that
The German journalist, von Tyszka:
And:
“Special organisations” are spoken of only once. Questions by a Swiss charity organisation are answered by the consulate in Mossul:
(III) Turkish Resistance to the Deportations

The German observers noted in several places that the liquidation of the Armenians was also condemned by many Turks. In his report on the events in Zeitun, i.e. before the quasi-official beginning of the deportations, Consul Roessler wrote that the initiators of a plan to deport all the Armenians from Zeitun and to raze the town


Blank, the German missionary, writes about a train of deportees from Zeitun; the brutal action against the Armenians
Consul Bergfeld reports from Trebizond:
Consul Roessler quotes a Turkish major:
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter writes from Erzerum:
And:
The Geman journalist, von Tyszka, reports:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich reports to Berlin, that
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Alexandrette writes:
Consul Loytved Hardegg reports on a conversation with the former Vali from Saloniki and Aleppo. He was deeply shocked by these occurrences and told the consul:

Chapter 6: The Role of the Germans

In the documents published by Lepsius, many of those places have often been abridged in which the role of the Germans in the genocide was described in a negative manner. Other documents in which the Germans are portrayed unfavourably were not even included in the collection of documents. Thus, a chapter on the Germans and the Armenian genocide which is based on the documents published by Lepsius has only a limited significance and must, of necessity, be incomplete. Only after the planned publication of all of the German documents on genocide by the Foreign Office can a more extensive chapter be written on this problem area.

(I) Germany and the Armenians of the Ottoman Empire

1) Antipathy of the Armenian Population towards Germany

Similar to the majority of the Young Turks, the Germans also largely met with indifference or even antipathy from the Armenians. This critical attitude towards Germany had its roots in the persecution of the Armenians from 1894 to 1896, when the German Empire sided with Sultan Abdul Hamid.

After the fighting in Zeitun, Germany’s consul in Aleppo, Walter Roessler, noticed in the northern area of his working district an


The German ambassador in Constantinople, Hans Baron von Wangenheim, stated that in Adana there was also an
Wangenheim stated that Consul Buege also reported the same thing from Adana:
Wangenheim writes that Zaven, the Armenian Patriarch from Constantinople, also commented on the anti-German sentiments among his countrymen, but toned them down:
Wangenheim on the Patriarch’s statements:
Vice-Consul Hermann Hoffmann-Foelkersamb reports from Alexandrette:
Vice-Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter from Erzerum writes on the relationship of the Armenians to the Germans:
Undersecretary of State Zimmermann in his notes for the 86th session of the Budget Committee of the Reich on 29 September 1916:
2) Search for Refuge by the Armenian Clergy

Contrary to the simple people, the Armenian clergy searched for a certain protection among their German fellow clergymen for reasons of political survival. The Consul of Erzerum at that time, Edgar Anders, reported after a visit to Etchmiadzin that the Catholicos, Kevork V, was already pleased before the war that Germany had set up a consular representation in Erzerum. Anders:


Shortly before the beginning of the war Anders also reported from Mezere, the new urban centre near the provincial capital of Kharput:
After the outbreak of war and the proclaimed “Holy War” (which could only be against the Christians), the Armenian clergy searched for stronger protection with Germany. The Armenian Patriarch even asked the German Ambassador Wangenheim
Wangenheim, however, already indicated another position, even though he made promises which would later not be kept by Germany. He stated to the Armenian Patriarch
Wangenheim refused to accept the definite role of mediator for, so he argued:
Anders’ successor in Erzerum, the administrator Erwin Max von Scheubner-Richter, on the other hand, saw a long-lasting gain for Germany, including an economical one, from taking influence in favour of the Armenians:
3) Political Pressure on the Armenians

From the very beginning, the Germans attempted to hold the Armenians to a loyal attitude towards the Turkish ally. Friedrich Schuchardt, the director and deputy chairman of the German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient, gives an example in a letter to Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg:


Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports from Aleppo that for the Armenians
In his notes for the Budget Committee of the Reichstag, Undersecretary of State Zimmermann describes how this attempt to exercise influence was officially carried out even before the genocide began:
In further notes, which Zimmermann made for a discussion with the Grand Duchess of Baden at the end of September, he states:
(II) Germany’s Position with Regard to the Deportations

Even after the deportations began and the first reports arrived on the murder of all the passengers of the deportation trains, the Germans continued their policy of support for Turkey, their ally, even though this policy was occasionally verbally limited. The argument in particular that the deportations were necessary “for military reasons” was accepted even by some of the German consuls who had pronounced themselves against the sanctions.

1) Approval of the Deportations

Ambassador Wangenheim moderated Scheubner-Richter’s request to protest to the Supreme Commander in Erzerum against the deportations:


Wangenheim wrote to the Foreign Office that the measures taken by the Turkish government against the Armenians meant
According to Wangenheim, Johannes Lepsius and the German friends of the Armenians were to be informed, that
Wangenheim writes that although Germany should energetically intervene against the “slaughtering of the defenceless population“, the Germans could not, however,
Wangenheim, two weeks later:
Even Consul Roessler accepted “military reasons“:
The German diplomats always had sympathy for the supposedly clear-cut situation with regard to the events in Van. Scheubner-Richter:
Even the very critical Lieutenant Colonel Stange qualifies:
In a discussion with the Turkish ambassador, Undersecretary of State Zimmermann also accepts that
Undersecretary of State Zimmermann notes in his justification to the German Reichstag that the circumstances
Zimmermann then defends the
Several German diplomats and observers doubt, however, whether there were any “military reasons ” for the deportations at all. Even Ambassador Wangenheim admits:
Scheubner-Richter assesses the deportation of all the Armenians from Erzerum as being
Lieutenant Colonel Stange:
2) The Principle of Non-Intervention in Turkish Politics

In order to counteract the accusation that they were interfering in Turkish politics, Ambassador Wangenheim recommended that his consuls exercise extreme restraint in case of possible protests. Because the first deportations reported to the German embassy in Constantinople took place in Erzerum and the surrounding area, this attitude of Wangenheim’s was most clear in his correspondence with Scheubner-Richter, the vice-consul there. In a directive to Scheubner-Richter, Wangenheim instructed him as follows:


Wangenheim recommends that, at best, his consul in Erzerum
Scheubner-Richter’s answer:
But Wangenheim also urged other consuls to restraint. With regard to reports on deportations from Adana he replies:
3) Disapproval of the Genocide by Germans in Turkey

The German consuls reported explicitly and very exactly on the events in their administrative districts to their embassies resp. the head office in Berlin, as has been verified often in the previous chapters. Sometimes their desperation can be felt: that, although their superiors were well informed on the genocide, they were obviously not prepared or in a position to draw the right conclusions. The sentence placed in brackets by Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Alexandrette is an example of the German consuls’ hidden criticism of their superiors:


The ambassadors in Constantinople, for their part, attempted to reassure their consuls. There is also an example for this, in a telegram sent by Hohenlohe-Langenburg to Roessler:
The consuls and their informants in part openly disapproved of the deportations as well as the annihilations and appealed to their superiors to take action against these measures. Consul Walter Roessler from Aleppo:
Vice-Consul Walter Holstein from Mossul:
Vice-Consul Kuckhoff in a telegram from Samsun to Wangenheim:
Consul Roessler:
Vice-Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter from Erzerum considered it
German private individuals reacted even more impulsively to the massacres. Roessler reports:
Together with friends, the head of the Konia branch of the Anatolian Association of Industry and Commerce, Willy Seeger, wrote in a letter to the embassy:
The expert on Armenia at the embassy, Mordtmann, spoke with the Regie official, von Holbach, who had been living in Turkey for many years, and then wrote in his notes:
In contrast, the verbal protests of the top German diplomats in Constantinople were extremely limited.

Even before 24 April, Ambassador Wangenheim qualified:


Wangenheim in a memo:
The success of such timid interventions amounted to nothing. Wangenheim:
Wangenheim in another letter:
Wangenheim in an answer to Kuckhoff:
In one of his notes, Mordtmann informs that
Mordtmann states that upon receiving the request to exempt the Armenian employees of a German,
From Prince Hohenlohe-Langenburg, Wangenheim’s representative and the Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission, to the consulate in Aleppo:
Hohenlohe-Langenburg does at least make a timid attempt to dissociate himself in the press from the Turks’ actions. He writes to Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg:
Baron von Neurath, the councillor at the embassy who was to defend German interests as chargé d’affaires after Wangenheim’s death, immediately lowered the moral standards again. Regarding a list of interventions from Mordtmann, he writes:
The reluctance of the German representatives to really support the Armenians’ cause with all their strength became apparent in the case of the two Armenians politicians, Zohrab and Vartkes. Armenian expert Mordtmann notes that upon intervention by the German embassy
The extreme caution of the German diplomats is also evident in a directive from Zimmermann to his ambassador that he use the supposed order of the Turkish government to protect the Armenians as a straw. The Undersecretary of State requests that his ambassador
Only after very urgent reports from the German consuls did Secretary of State Jagow make one more attempt to achieve results for the Armenians by protesting verbally. He wrote to his ambassador:
The first, and only, German ambassador who seemed to be prepared to really do what he could for the Armenians was the successor of Wangenheim, who died on 25 October 1915, Paul Count Wolff-Metternich:
The text which Wolff-Metternich suggested was by no means exceptionally harsh. It was worded:
What obviously outraged Metternich the most was the Turks’ arrogance. He advised, that
Undersecretary of State Zimmermann commented his draft of the newspaper article:
Secretary of State Gottlieb von Jagow also agreed:
Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg opposed this vigorously:
With this, the course was mapped out for the German reaction to the genocide of 1915/16, and even Wolff-Metternich subordinated to it. Kuehlmann, the Ambassador in Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, simply rejected further protests, because in his opinion
Future protests against the Turkish allies were less intended to assist the Armenians in any way whatsoever and more to divert any harm from the Germans.

Scheubner-Richter, the man at the front, later doubted in a memo to the Foreign Office whether such restraint had paid off:


(III) Germany and the Consequences of the Genocide

It was soon very obvious to the diplomats and the politicians that the Armenian genocide would not be accepted by the rest of the world and impair not only Turkey’s future, but also Germany’s. Thus, their efforts were then increasingly directed towards calculating the negative consequences of the genocide and absorbing them by diplomatic and propagandist means.

1) Germany’s Economic Interests in Turkey

In the years before the outbreak of the First World War, German investments in Turkey had risen considerably. The Greeks and the Armenians were the Germans’ most important trading partners in the Ottoman Empire for they controlled trade. But even in general, the Germans feared economic disadvantages from the actions taken against the Armenians. Consul Buege reports from Adana:


Ambassador Wangenheim:
The German embassy requests in a memo,
Vice-Consul Kuckhoff reports from Samsun:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann makes suggestions in case
Consul Count Spee writes with regard to the deportation of the Armenians from Smyrna:
2) The Public in Germany:

Although the press was strictly censored in Germany, it was particularly through the publications by Johannes Lepsius and the Director of the German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient, Friedrich Schuchardt, generally in church bulletins and missionary writings, that part of the German public was, in fact, informed of the progress of the Armenian genocide. This resulted in protests from ecclesiastical circles, to which politicians and diplomats reacted: by preventing the flow of information or by pacification.

In connection with the transportation of a letter from the German missionary, Karl Blank, to Schuchardt, Wangenheim notes that it seems to be necessary


At any rate, the reports from the Christian missions were not without influence on the diplomats in Berlin. Rosenberg, the Legation Secretary in the Foreign Office, informed the Turkish embassy in Berlin that
Shortly before Bethmann Hollweg rejected the suggestions made by Wolff-Metternich, the German Christians had made a petition to the Imperial Chancellor in which the Protestants referred to reports from Turkey and admonished:
Bethmann Hollweg then sent a letter to the chargé d’affaires in Constantinople, Neurath:
In his answer to the Protestant Christians, Bethmann Hollweg writes:
The comparison of the decision given to the German Christians and the harsh reply to Wolff-Metternich’s suggestion make it clear that in the eyes of the top German politicians the protests were only of a rhetorical nature. Thus, Karl Axenfeld, the Director of the Orient- and Islam-Commission of the German Protestant Mission-Board is also irritated
3) The People of the World

The diplomats had to take the international public far more seriously into account than the Germans when they would be preparing the peace treaty after the end of the war. They knew that the close alliance with Turkey alone meant that the German Reich also had a share of the responsibility for the genocide.

Even very early on it was clear to Ambassador Wangenheim


The German ambassador attempted to take preventive measures against this accusation:
Vice-Consul Kuckhoff warned from Samsun:
Wangenheim writes:
A Reuters report confirmed the Germans’ fears:
The German Protestant Christians in their petition to the Imperial Chancellor:
From the Undersecretary of State in the Foreign Office, Bussche-Haddenhausen, to the embassy in Constantinople:
(IV) Germany’s Joint Responsibility for the Genocide

A possible share on Germany’s part of the responsibility for the genocide which went beyond the toleration of measures motivated by military considerations or not founded at all was one of the aspects which were to be suppressed in the documents published by Lepsius. This, of course, was not completely achieved.

1) Statements on German Involvement in the Genocide

The consuls and informants learned from very different sources and reported on the fact that not only the Armenians, but also the Turks assumed that the Germans had been involved in the Armenian genocide. Consul Roessler reports from Aleppo:


Roessler quotes a witness:
The administrator Scheubner-Richter writes:
Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports from Aleppo:
The German Protestant Christians write in their petition to the Imperial Chancellor:
Mordtmann, the German consul general who was entrusted with reporting on the Armenians in Turkey, noted after a discussion with the Swedish nun, Alma Johansson, who was in the service of the “German Christian Charity-Organisation for the Orient”:
The administrator Scheubner-Richter:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich reports to the Foreign Office that it was being spread in the country
Vice-Consul Hoffmann writes from Alexandrette:
Hoffmann also reports on the opinion of his colleague Holstein from Mossul:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann quotes a German officer who had been given a description of the murder of entire trains of Armenians by an Arab, and who added:
Count Spee, the German consul in Smyrna, which today is known as Izmir, writes on the deportation of the Armenians from his town:
Ernst I. Christoffel, the head of the Home for the Blind in Malatia, reports to the embassy:
Karl Axenfeld, the director of the Orient- and Islam-Commission of the German Protestant Mission-Board:
2) Protests against a German Involvement in the Genocide

While those Germans responsible greatly restrained themselves in their official diplomatic moves against the genocide, they noticeably intensified their protests against claims of a German joint responsibility. Undersecretary of State Zimmermann sent a telegram to Wangenheim:


Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg reports to his Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg
The German embassy informs the Ottoman government in a memo that in view of the continuing deportations it
From Secretary of State Jagow to his ambassador in Constantinople:
Wolff-Metternich reports to Berlin that he discussed with the Grand Vizier
A week or so later Wolff-Metternich spoke to Talaat and reported to the Imperial Chancellor:
3) German Settlement Plans for Armenians along the Baghdad Railway Line?

Germany’s most important economic project in the Ottoman Empire was the Baghdad railway which, at the outbreak of the war, had been completed as far as Nusaybin, today a town on the border to Syria, but which was not able to run the entire distance, because important parts through the mountains were missing which had to be connected by tunnels. But many Armenians settled along a part of the Baghdad railway line, especially in Kilikien, and these people also made up an important part of the staff of this prestigious German project. Early on, the Catholicos of all the Armenians had recommended these Armenians to the care of the Germans. After a visit to Etchmiadzin, the German consul in Erzerum at that time reported that Kevork V. had said to him:


There were, however, also indications concerning plans with the Armenians which went much further, although these were deleted in the Lepsius edition. Scheubner-Richter, the administrator, writes:
Tyszka, the German journalist, also mentions this delicate subject and writes:
In his notes for the 86th session of the Budget Committee of the Reich on 29 September 1916, Zimmermann does not speak of these plans in detail, but writes generally:
There is a similar passage in his notes for a discussion with the Grand Duchess of Baden at the end of September 1916:
4) The Baghdad Railway and its Armenian Employees

The Armenian employees of the Baghdad Railway are also only mentioned in passing in the Lepsius documents, and only in a very fragmentary way. With regard to his administrative district, eastern Kilikien, Vice-Consul Hoffmann writes:


Further indications of the deportation of the Armenian employees are only given through telegrams which have been passed on. Thus, the Anatolian Railway Company reports
Two days later, the next telegram came in on the teleprinters of the German embassy:
And again a day later:
The last report (in the Lepsius documents) is from the spring of 1917:
In the final document published, Lepsius permits the Chairman of the Baghdad Railway Company, Franz J. Guenther, to go into great detail in a letter to the Board of Directors:
(V) German Attempts at Justification

Undersecretary of State Zimmermann’s notes for the 86th session of the Budget Committee of the Reich on 29 September 1916 are about the only document in the files selected by Lepsius which justifies the German point of view on the Armenian genocide:


(VI) The German Military

No aspect has been so rigorously deleted in the files published by Lepsius as the one concerning the participation of German officers in actions against the Armenians. In any case, military matters only played a minor role in those Foreign Office files which were concerned with the genocide. Thus, even in the adjusted version of the published files there are only a few indications on the role of German officers in the genocide.

Roessler, the consul in Aleppo, reports that in Zeitun the Turkish authorities acted harshly against Armenian deserters, possibly at the order of the Germans.


In his report on the suppression of the alleged riot in Zeitun, Roessler stated:
Roessler writes to Ambassador Wangenheim:
Wolff-Metternich gives a further indication of the intervention by German military:
Reserve officer Scheubner-Richter, who was relieved as administrator, was confronted on his way to Persia with the problem of having to attack an Armenian village with alleged rebels. Scheubner-Richter:
There are only two episodes in the Lepsius documents in which it is proved that German officers did not take part in actions against the Armenians. Roessler reports on one of these:
Kuehlmann, the Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission, writes with regard to a further episode:



Copyright © 1995-2026 Wolfgang & Sigrid Gust (Ed.): www.armenocide.net A Documentation of the Armenian Genocide in World War I. All rights reserved