Chapter 4: The Policy of the Final Solution

Germany was the closest ally of the Ottoman Empire. Contacts which took place almost daily between German diplomats and Turkish partners led to a series of references on the real reasons why the Young Turks wanted to destroy the Armenians as a nation, and their motives. They were also aware of efforts undertaken by the Young Turk leaders to hush up the reality of a planned genocide: by means of counter-orders which were obviously only meant as a deception, as far as simply denying the genocide.

(I) The Collision Course

It is not clear from the German diplomatic sources when the decision concerning the Armenian genocide was made by the Turkish leaders. However, the German sources did show the change towards an ultra-nationalistic policy.

1) The Policy of the Young Turks

The break from the mutuality with Armenian politicians to their persecution and murder was outwardly characterised by the assignment of reforms for the Armenian provinces which had been worked out by the Great Powers, especially Russia and Germany, in the embassy discussions in Constantinople. These reforms were to give the Armenians certain autonomous rights and, thus, protection against despotic acts by the Turkish administration, as had been common in the past. Ambassador Hans Baron von Wangenheim describes the termination of the contract with Hoff and Westenenk, politicians who were intended to become general inspectors for the Armenian provinces


Minister of the Interior Talaat Pascha justified the arrests on 24 and 25 April towards the first dragoman of the German Embassy as follows:
Consul General Mordtmann, responsible for reporting on the Armenians, reports after a conversation with the Minister of the Interior that Talaat
In a further conversation with Mordtmann, Talaat said:
The German journalist, von Tyszka, especially noticed the manner in which the Young Turk rulers were pursuing their ultra-nationalistic goal. He writes:
The Turkish newspaper, “Teswiri Efkiar” ( No. 1886 dated 7 October 1916) reported on the swing by the Young Turks’ executive leaders from a co-existence with the minorities to their annihilation. The chargé d’affaires in Constantinople, Legation Councillor Radowitz, comments that this article reaches the conclusion
“Teswiri Efkiar” demands that Turkey must
The typical conclusion of the nationalistic newspaper, which can hardly be outdone in its cynicism:
Vice-Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, who not only witnessed deportations in Erzerum, but also knew exactly the opinion of the local residential prominent advocates and organisers of the genocide, summarises his impressions in an extensive report:
Scheubner-Richter further on the motives of those Young Turks responsible for the genocide:
Scheubner-Richter was convinced that the annihilation of the Armenians was not the only item on the programme of the Young Turk agitators. In his report he writes:
The reverse conclusion given in a report by the Ambassador in Extraordinary Mission, Richard von Kuehlmann, was that the nationalistic line taken by the Young Turks determined the policy towards the Armenians. After Talaat’s appointment as Grand Vizier, Kuehlmann writes:
In a memo he wrote for a conversation with the Grand Duchess of Baden at the End of September 1916, the Secretary of State of the German Foreign Office, Zimmermann, also had to concede the guilt of the Young Turks:
2) The Role of the Turkish Military

Possibly, the deportation and extensive annihilation of the Armenians was decided upon by the Young Turks, but it was also supported by the Turkish military – if it was not actually, at least in part, the initiator, for example in the region of Erzerum. Although it also partly justified the deportations on the basis of military necessity, it went far beyond the necessary steps as far as open propagation of the annihilation of the Armenians. Because Erzerum was one of the most important, if not the most important regional centre of genocide, the German diplomatic reports on the role of the military go back at the beginning to the Administrator and Vice-Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter who, as he himself was an active officer, was able to give authentic reports on the intentions of his Turkish colleagues.

Already before 24 April, Scheubner-Richter reports from Erzerum:


After 24 April, he speaks of
One day later:
The Vice-Consul continues:
Less than one month later he reports:
Scheubner-Richter reports that the
A week later, the German Vice-Consul writes that the Vali had assured him that the responsibility for the deportations was not
Lieutenant Colonel Stange, stationed in Erzerum, also confirmed that the military took the initiative in the deportations.
But the leaders of the Turkish army were also involved in the annihilation of the Armenians in other areas. Vice-Consul Holstein reports from Mossul:
And Consul Roessler reports that the army also seems to have ordered deportations in his administrative district of Aleppo. He writes that the Armenians from Aintab were deported
A letter from the Consulate Secretary, Werth, who wanted to obtain an exemption for Armenians employed by Germans, shows that even the highest military posts in Erzerum continued to rigorously deport the Armenians:
(II) The Motives for the Annihilation of the Armenians

1) Gains

The Armenians in Turkey were considered to be hard-working and rich. This stimulated the greed to enrich oneself at their expense. Although such gains are a little-known motive for the annihilation of the Armenians, they have been ascertained again and again by German observations.

An eye witness had reported to Roessler:


Johann Mordtmann, the expert on Armenians at the German Embassy in Constantinople, clearly states in a memo as one of the
Time and again deportation trains were plundert, and there is evidence of this in many documents. Here are just two examples. An eye witness reported to Roessler:
The population of those regions took part in these gains, through which the Armenian deportees had to pass. Especially those people profited, who exercised power over the Armenians. Here are another two examples. Lieutenant Colonel Stange reports that the
At the intervention of the German Baghdad Railway official, Bastendorff, two Armenian employees were able to return to their job:
In those towns which the Armenians had left, the population helped itself. The wife of the head of the orphanage in Kharput, Mrs. Ehmann, writes:
But especially those people profitted from the disappearance of the Armenians, who had ordered and carried out the deportations. This already held for the Armenians who had to leave their place of residence before the mass deportations began. The German missionary, Blank, reports on the deportees from Zeitun:
The greatest riches of the deported Armenians lay in their real estate and the goods the traders had to leave behind. The Young Turks who carried out such dispossessions as well as their accomplices had their eyes particularly on these objects. Consul Bergfeld reports from Trapezunt on the Armenians’ estates which – for the time being – were confiscated by the government:
Lieutenant Colonel Stange reports:
Consul Bergfeld reports from Trapezunt:
They were not mistaken. In his next report, Bergfeld writes:

With little exception, public officials and police divisions are enriching themselves during the vacation of the Armenian houses in the most shameless way. [1915-08-27-DE-013]

Bergfeld speaks of the


No one in the ministries in Constantinople planned to return confiscated goods. Ambassador Wolff-Metternich made a request to the Ministry of the Interior for the return of a certain group of Armenians. His partners in discussion explained to him:
Turkish politicians or the state not only enriched themselves on the estates of the Armenians, but they also fleeced the business partners of the deportees. Vice-Consul Hoffmann speaks of
The director of the Deutsche Bank then mockingly comments on the liquidation law, the so-called “Loi provisoire”, according to which the estates of the deported Armenians are to be settled:
Consul Count Spee reports from Smyrna:
Sometimes the avarice of the local Turks aided the Armenians. Thus, Vice-Consul Hoffmann suspects that the Armenians from Aleppo owed their greatly being spared up to this point

mainly to the resistance of those local circles who would suffer great losses of money if they disappeared. [1916-01-03-DE-001]

2) The Will of the Turkish Hardliners to Destroy

The elimination of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire could not have been achieved solely by means of goading peoples’ greed. Those responsible for the genocide went several steps further. They not only deported and killed those they suspected of resisting the authority of the state, of causing revolts and of treason, they also went as far as jointly and severally confining an entire people for the possible crimes of individuals.

Consul Roessler complained:


One day later Roessler writes:
Vice-Consul Kuckhoff from Samsun:
Consul Roessler writes that the Turkish government
Lieutenant Colonel Stange is outraged over “the authorities” for they seem
As a matter of course, political or military leaders ordered the arrests of entire clans in which entire families of the supposed guilty or even entire social classes were to make amends. Ambassador Neurath cites a case in which he requested that Armenians working for the Germans and, thus, an ally be saved. The Turkish general (Fakhri Pasha) responsible
With regard to the reactions of the most important Young Turks, Ambassador Wolff-Metternich says:
According to Wolff-Metternich, Minister of the Interior Talaat told him in a conversation:
Wolff-Metternich was surprised by Talaat and his colleagues:
Even in a highly official answer by the Supreme Porte to petitions by the German embassy, the Turkish government speaks of “measures against the Armenian population” and not against those responsible for certain deeds:
Ernst I. Christoffel, the head of Malatia, the home for the blind, on the Armenian people, usually called “nation” in the Ottoman Empire:
This Armenian “nation” was a part of the Ottoman Empire, and the oldest by far. In the 19th century, the Turkish sultan, Abdul Hamid, had already directed his hatred of the Armenians towards the entire nation. According to Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter, the Turkish government now
The hatred of the Armenians is a constantly recurring phrase in the German sources. Four passages in the documents can be used as examples.

An eye witness reported to Roessler:


Lieutenant Colonel Stange reports that the deportation of the Armenians from Erzerum was
The German engineer, Bastendorff, describes a scene at the railway station in Ras-ul-Ain:
In another passage Bastendorff writes:
Undersecretary of State Zimmermann also had to admit:
There are clear references in the German reports to a collective intention to kill on the part of the Turkish hardliners. One of the most critical observers of the genocide, Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter, speaks in one of his reports of the
In the files, he describes who is striving for this final solution and how, in his opinion, this goal can be achieved: according to Scheubner-Richter, the supporters of the local committee
The goal of this group was
Ambassador Wangenheim, who usually tends to be more cautious, confirms his opinion:
Consul Roessler from Aleppo:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann reports from Aleppo on 300000 Armenians who are to be deported to the south:
Bastendorff, the German engineer at the Baghdad Railway, writes in a report to Roessler, which the German consul approved of and sent on to Berlin:
Roessler reports from Aleppo, where the headquarters for the final solution for the Armenians was located:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann states more precisely:
(III) The Dimension of the Genocide

If the statements of the German diplomats and their informants on the individual aspects of the deportations already verify that the decimation resp. annihilation of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire was the main goal of the Young Turks, then the key quotations, including those of the German diplomats and observers, make it clear that, in their opinion, the deportations constituted genocide.

Scheubner-Richter from Erzerum:


Consul Bergfeld from Trapezunt:
Ambassador Wangenheim speaks of
Bergfeld reports that in his administrative district no deportations have yet taken place, but that the signs point to the fact
Vice-Consul Kuckhoff from Samsun writes:
Furthermore, he speaks of the
Consul Roessler writes that the Turkish government is
And, on the same day:
Scheubner-Richter reports that
Scheubner-Richter speaks of the attempt by the Turkish government
The German Vice-Consul from Erzerum writes in another document:
Scheubner-Richter speaks of a
The Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission, Prince Hohenlohe-Langenburg, writes to various German consulates:
In a report to the Imperial Chancellor, Bethmann-Hollweg, Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg speaks of the
as well as of the
The German embassy informs the Ottoman government in a memo that it regrets having to ascertain that incidents
Consul Roessler speaks of the
and reaches the conclusion that
The Germans Seeger, Biegel and other signatories write:

The whole measure seems to be aimed at a complete extermination of the Armenians. [1915-08-21-DE-011]

Lieutenant Colonel Stange on the deportation of the Armenians from Erzerum, even though it was known that the deportation routes were unsafe, resp. that killer troops waited there for the Armenians:


In the same report, Stange says
Stange further suspects that the government was working according to
Hohenlohe-Langenburg quotes Roessler:
Consul Roessler in a letter:
The Legation Councillor in the German Foreign Office who was responsible for Turkey, Frederic Hans von Rosenberg, speaks of the
Von Tyszka, the German journalist:
And:
And:
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Aleppo:
Neukirch, the German Red Cross doctor from Ersindjan, reports:
The German Protestant Christians in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor:
They were convinced that
The Mission Board of the Central Committee for the General Meetings of Catholics in Germany speaks of
Foreign Secretary of State Jagow requests that his ambassador lodge a protest with the Turkish government
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich reports:
Wolff-Metternich writes to Bethmann Hollweg that he pointed out to the Grand Vizier that
The Ambassador speaks of
Vice-Consul Hoffmann from Alexandrette:
According to Hoffmann,
Hoffmann speaks further of
Lechnig, the clerk at the German Consulate, on the inhabitants of the camp in Tell Abiad who supposedly could not be further deported, because Bedouins besieged the routes:
Martin Niepage, the German secondary school teacher in Aleppo, speaks of
His colleague and school director, Eduard Graeter, on
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich feared,
Consul Roessler speaks of
The Consul of Tabris, Wilhelm Litten, writes after a journey along the death routes of the Armenians:
Matthias Erzberger, the German member of the Reichstag and later Foreign Secretary of State, after a journey to Constantinople:
Consul Roessler:
Consul Loytved Hardegg from Damascus reports on a discussion with the former Wali of Saloniki and Aleppo, Hussein Kasim Bey, who professed the fear that the Armenians
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich:
Ernst Jacob Christoffel, the German vicar:
Ambassador Wolff-Metternich on the merging of both Catholicos of Sis and Aghtamar with the Patriarchs of Constantinople and Jerusalem:
In a memo, Undersecretary of State Zimmermann speaks of
Vice-Consul Scheubner-Richter summarises the deportations:
The Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, Kuehlmann, says:
Finally, one of the heads of German foreign policy, Arthur Zimmermann, had to admit in a report in which he was mainly concerned with playing down the consequences of the deportations and avoiding any allusion to genocide
(IV) The Statistics on the Genocide

There are several statements on the number of deported and murdered Armenians, some of which only refer to certain sections. But they are useful for gaining an impression of the size which the observers on the spot perceived.

Consul Roessler reports:


Already in the middle of 1915, he believed that, according to his own figures:
Consul Buege reports from Adana:
Von Tyszka, the German journalist, refuses to make a projection, because:
On the other hand, the German Protestant Christians include their estimation in a petition to the Imperial Chancellor:
Concerning the total number of victims, the Protestant Christians write:
The Chairman of the German-Armenian Association, Johannes Lepsius, speaks
The Reichstag parliamentarian, Matthias Erzberger, received a report from two “intermediary agents who were absolutely sure”:
Based on the investigations of the Swiss nun, Rohner, the Chargé d’ Affaires of the Embassy in Constantinople, Radowitz, projects the total figure of the victims and confronts her with the figures which are making the rounds in the capital city:
The head of Malatia, the home for the blind, Ernst I. Christoffel, gives an estimation, albeit of necessity a very private one:
The Austrian-Hungarian representative in Tiflis, Georg Baron von and zu Franckenstein, had a discussion with the Minister of the Interior of the Armenian Republic, Aram Manukian, which was documented in the archives of the Foreign Office. Franckenstein:
(V) Covering Up and Denying the Genocide

Even today, the Armenian genocide is denied by those affected, the Turkish government, but also by scientists. This is made easier for those who deny the genocide, at least it seems to be so, by orders and counter-orders given by the Ottoman leaders, who used this method as a general attempt to hush up the crimes they ordered to be carried out. The assessment of such orders is made difficult by the fact that, at least according to German sources, one of the most important members of the triumvirate did not completely support the official standpoint which was oriented towards the annihilation of the Armenians: the Minister of Naval Affairs and Supreme Commander of the 4th Army, stationed in the south, Djemal Pascha.

Roessler reports that already before the beginning of the deportations on a large scale, Djemal Pascha had given orders


The French version of Djemal’s order was as follows:
Later, Djemal continued to carry out this policy, even though it was toned down. Roessler reports from Aleppo:
Statements made and orders given by the Young Turk leaders are definitely of a different calibre and, considering the reports made by the German observers, they can only be regarded as cynical.

Mordtmann, the Armenian expert, notes after a discussion with Talaat:


Consul Bergfeld reports from Trapezunt:
Roessler reports that there were at least two different orders which cancelled each other:
Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg reports from Constantinople:
It is, indeed, amazing just how long the German official posts attached great importance to these counter-orders. Ambassador Hohenlohe reports again that counter-orders have been given, seemingly as a concession, although his report carries a slightly sceptical undertone:
Otto Robert Moritz Goeppert, the Legation Councillor and Council Spokesman at the Foreign Office in Berlin who was “on temporary assignment” to the embassy in Constantinople to deputise for Ambassador Kuehlmann while the latter was on holiday, also saw no trap and reports:
Mordtmann, the embassy’s Armenian expert, reports:
The German Embassy in Constantinople telegraphs to various consulates:
Mordtmann added a further piece of information to the files which he placed in quotation marks, considering the fact that during the event cited completely defenceless Armenians faced heavily armed Turks; namely
This was the extent of the mistrust found in the German embassy in Constantinople at this point. It was only the German representatives on the spot who realised the true value of these counter-orders. Consul Buege from Adana answers:
Only now did Ambassador Hohenlohe also recognise the two-sided nature of these orders, and he telegraphs to the Foreign Office that several events were
When Consul Roessler in Aleppo, for his part, demonstrated the ambiguity of the counter-orders, which were only given after the deportation of the Catholic and Protestant Armenians:
the embassy in Constantinople answered rather abashedly:
Ambassador Hohenlohe-Langenburg now also had to report to Berlin that he had been deceived:
The following telegram had previously been received from Consul Roessler:
Hohenlohe-Langenburg had to admit once again:
The ban on taking photographs is an example of just how much those Turks responsible for the genocide wished to destroy all traces of their deeds. Consul Roessler reports:
On 10 September 1915, the Turkish Military Commissioner sent the following letter to the Chief Engineer of Building Department III of the Baghdad Railway:
Von Tyszka, the German journalist, demonstrated another variant on the deceptions:
In a discussion with Rosenberg, the clerk at the German Foreign Office, the Councillor at the Turkish Embassy in Berlin, Edhem Bey, presumed to claim that:
Rosenberg had commented on the discussion with Edhem without making any critical remarks. After the murder of Armenians in Djeziré, Ambassador Wangenheim was definitely more careful when he repeated Talaat’s answer; the latter had stated:
However, Ambassador Wolff-Metternich states dryly:
But it was just the German diplomats in Constantinople who gladly agreed with the declarations of the Young Turk leaders, because they saw in this some success for their attempts to attain relief for the Armenians. Even the critical Wolff-Metternich is no exception:
Matthias Erzberger, the Centre politician, was also taken in by these promises. After discussions with Enver and Talaat, he notes:
But that was indeed going too far for the German ambassador. Wolff-Metternich on Erzberger’s report:
Wolff-Metternich, some weeks later:
After reading Sister Beatrice Rohner’s statistics, Radowitz, the Legation Councillor, had to admit:
The Legation Councillor Goeppert also had to admit that he had been deceived:
After the Armenians had practically been annihilated, Kuehlmann, the Ambassador on Extraordinary Mission in Constantinople, fell back once again into the old naivety:
A week later, Kuehlmann rose to repeat a comment made by the newly appointed Grand Vizier, Talaat Pascha, which can hardly be outdone for its cynicism:
It was especially those German diplomats who were on the spot who spoke bluntly and did not allow themselves to be deceived. What outraged them the most were the unheard-of lies which the Turkish press served its readers, and which were repeated without comment or reservations by the German newspapers which were dependent on the government. Some of these newspaper articles are commented thus by Vice-Consul Holstein:
Consul Roessler made a bitter verbal attack in order to give vent to his indignation after he had read an explanation from the official Turkish news agency, “Milli”, in the official German “Norddeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung”. Roessler:


Copyright © 1995-2026 Wolfgang & Sigrid Gust (Ed.): www.armenocide.net A Documentation of the Armenian Genocide in World War I. All rights reserved